The organisers of the European Quality Assurance Forum (EQAF) are looking for a university to host the 11th EQAF, which is scheduled to take place in November 2016. We would like to invite EUA member universities that match the criteria to consider hosting the event. More...
Ukraine gains access to Horizon 2020
Ukraine has signed an agreement with the EU that will allow it to participate in Horizon 2020, giving the country’s researchers, innovators and businesses the chance to benefit from the EU’s €80 billion research programme.
The Agreement for the Association of Ukraine to Horizon 2020, signed by Carlos Moedas at a ceremony in Kiev last month, will see the country renew its membership of the EU research community. More...
Higher education is too important to be left to the market
“Both Four Corners and ICAC have highlighted the massive risks our public universities face when they become too reliant on international student fee income to sustain their financial viability,” said Jeanie Rea, NTEU National President.
“Both reports point to the dangers and increased costs associated with enrolling students to add to university coffers, rather than honest regard for the students’ preparedness, including language proficiency, to be able to successfully complete the qualification.
“The reports highlight the tensions between maintaining academic standards and commercial interests that are inherently a consequence of the competition our public universities face in international student markets. More...
UWA closes down local research while funding controversial Danish centre
Deregulation, regulation, or...?
The forum will hear from Professor Glyn Davis, Vice Chancellor of the University of Melbourne, and Adam Bandt, Federal Member for Melbourne. Audience members will be invited to participate in the discussion.
NTEU National President, and chair of tomorrow’s forum, Jeannie Rea, said that it was important to fully explore all options before leaping straight into reform. More...
Rank Delusions
Every year, U.S. News & World Report, Times Higher Education,and othersupdate university rankings. Reactions are paradoxical. On the one hand, university administrators and faculty members scan the lists for evidence of small movements up or down. On the other hand, everyone knows that the top 10, or 20, or 50 names will be much the same as they have always been. The Duke sociologist Kieran Healy points to a four-tier classification of leading universities made in 1911, and compares it to the most recent U.S. News ranking. Of the top 20 universities in the ranking today, 16 were in the top class in 1911, one (Notre Dame) was in the second class, and three (Duke, Rice, and Caltech) had not yet been established under their current names. More...
Universities, Citizenship and Democracy
In preparation for the IAU Global Meeting of Associations 6, this issue - IAU Horizons, 21, 1 - offers reports on IAU priority areas, new projects and initiatives, especially LGEU, and upcoming events and conferences.
By Gilles Breton. Universities, Citizenship and Democracy
When listening to what is being said and reading what is being published, one comes to wonder if universities can be considered in terms other than, for example, the merchandizing (marketization) of higher education, the international rankings – 500 of 17,000 need we recall -, the contribution of universities to economic activity and to competitiveness, tuition fees and underfunding. If this type of discourse, with an economic and financial consonance, is hegemonic, fortunately, it is not unique. This is what rapidly comes to mind after reading the book entitled Reimagining Democratic Societies: a new era of personal and social responsibility.* Finally a puff of fresh air! Finally a work which demonstrates that if universities can obviously be considered as key economic players in the knowledge economy and in training the labour force, they can also contribute to the renovation and even the re-imagining of democracy in our societies. Download IAU Horizons, 21, 1.
Rethinking Social Innovations in Practice- the Case of the DST/NRF SARChI Chair in Development Education
In preparation for the IAU Global Meeting of Associations 6, this issue - IAU Horizons, 21, 1 - offers reports on IAU priority areas, new projects and initiatives, especially LGEU, and upcoming events and conferences.
By Catherine A. Odora Hoppers. Rethinking Social Innovations in Practice- the Case of the DST/NRF SARChI Chair in Development Education
Since its inception, higher education in sub-Saharan Africa has made significant strides, but also faced major challenges in particular in knowledge production paradigms, and developing methodologies to rethink thinking itself. To some, the solution to the crisis lies in Africanisation as part of a radical visioning of the university. To others, the solution is in reform of existing institutions. The Chair combines both theories and takes it further. It sees beyond the regulatory rules, to the social, legal and ethical innovative reforms of the constitutive rules governing the university as offering the best way out of the current crisis. Download IAU Horizons, 21, 1.
For social and corporate excellence
In preparation for the IAU Global Meeting of Associations 6, this issue - IAU Horizons, 21, 1 - offers reports on IAU priority areas, new projects and initiatives, especially LGEU, and upcoming events and conferences.
By Bernard Hugonnier. For social and corporate excellence
A large number of educational establishments now have the ambition to be part of the higher education institutions, which are recognized as ”excellent” in their country and the world. But what does this mean? For example, is it a question of recruiting the best professors and of selecting the best students? of offering the best courses? of developing the best research? of obtaining the best results in exams? of better preparing students to quickly get a job after graduation? or of facilitating the success of the largest number?
For the time being, we increasingly witness the development of a kind of ‘elitist excellence’ consisting in:
1. For the students: a strong selection at the entry, a highlevel competition between them, important personal work, a very dynamic system aiming at assessing knowledge, strict monitoring of attendance, a strong participation of the students during courses, a certain international mobility (often an academic year spent abroad).
2. For the professors-researchers: a selection of the ‘best’ on the basis of their research work or of their professional functions, an important obligation to publish, a fixedterm contract with an obligation of show ‘results’ (usually translated in terms of number of publications), a strong competition between them, an external evaluation based on bibliometrics and scientometrics. Download IAU Horizons, 21, 1.
For a perspective of social innovation focused on transformation: towards knowledge that changes the world
In preparation for the IAU Global Meeting of Associations 6, this issue - IAU Horizons, 21, 1 - offers reports on IAU priority areas, new projects and initiatives, especially LGEU, and upcoming events and conferences.
By Juan-Luis Klein. For a perspective of social innovation focused on transformation: towards knowledge that changes the world
Pondering on social transformation through social innovation means thinking about how experiments, which take place in civil society, in agencies, sometimes marginally, result in the transformation of society. It is a reflection on the practices of citizens and organizations working for the wellbeing of communities by experimenting with solutions to problems, which have not been resolved by the existing institutional structure, and, in some cases, caused by the existing institutional structure. Are these practices confined only to the provision of a timely solution to the problems experienced by the communities or do they fall within broader, more comprehensive processes that transform society. Download IAU Horizons, 21, 1.