Canalblog
Suivre ce blog Administration + Créer mon blog
Formation Continue du Supérieur
17 avril 2016

Évaluer la formation : entre consensus théorique et impérieuse mise en oeuvre, comment faire ?

21 avril 2016
Où : Paris
Contact et information pratique : Lieu : IGS - amphi rez-de-chaussée, 12 rue Alexandre Parodi - 75010 Paris Horaires : 8h45 à 12h45 
Évaluation des politiques, des systèmes, des organismes, des modalités, des programmes, des effets de la formation : de quoi parle-t-on ? L’évaluation, parce qu’elle constitue une dimension incontournable du processus de formation et du management de la fonction formation, est à la fois, une source inépuisable d’ouvrages, de recherches mais aussi un sujet de préoccupation très concret pour les acteurs. Voir l'article...

15 avril 2016

Évaluation en masse pour une pédagogie ciblée

sup-numerique.gouv.frLe rôle de l'évaluation dans l'apprentissage et sa déclinaison numérique doit permettre d'améliorer la qualité des formations. L'université de Tours a créé un espace d'évaluation qui permet aux enseignants d'évaluer un nombre important d'étudiant sans affecter les autres enseignants qui travaillent sur la même plateforme. Voir l'article...

13 avril 2016

Universities must measure student learning, not numbers

By David Haworth. It is high time universities started to measure more what they achieve in student learning, rather than in enrolments, the Presidents’ Forum of the Worldwide Universities Network has been told in Brussels. More...

6 avril 2016

Evaluation of Intelligent Grouping Based on Learners’ Collaboration Competence Level in Online Collaborative Learning

International Review of Research in Open and Distributed LearningIn this paper we explore the impact of an intelligent grouping algorithm based on learners’ collaborative competency when compared with (a) instructor based Grade Point Average (GPA) method level and (b) random method, on group outcomes and group collaboration problems in an online collaborative learning environment. More...

6 avril 2016

An Experimental Study of Satisfaction Response: Evaluation of Online Collaborative Learning

International Review of Research in Open and Distributed LearningOn the one hand, a growing amount of research discusses support for improving online collaborative learning quality, and many indicators are focused to assess its success. On the other hand, thinkLets for designing reputable and valuable collaborative processes have been developed for more than ten years. More...

6 avril 2016

Evaluation Criteria for Interactive E-Books for Open and Distance Learning

International Review of Research in Open and Distributed LearningThe aim of this mixed method study is to identify evaluation criteria for interactive e-books. To find answers for the research questions of the study, both quantitative and qualitative data were collected through a four-round Delphi study with a panel consisting of 30 experts. After that, a total of 20 interactive e-books were examined with heuristic inquiry methodology. More...

6 avril 2016

Measuring disorientation based on the Needleman-Wunsch algorithm

International Review of Research in Open and Distributed LearningThis study offers a new method to measure navigation disorientation in web based systems which is powerful learning medium for distance and open education. The Needleman-Wunsch algorithm is used to measure disorientation in a more precise manner. The process combines theoretical and applied knowledge from two previously distinct research areas, disorientation and string-matching. More...

6 avril 2016

Perceived usability evaluation of learning management systems: Empirical evaluation of the System Usability Scale

International Review of Research in Open and Distributed LearningPerceived usability affects greatly student’s learning effectiveness and overall learning experience, and thus is an important requirement of educational software. The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a well-researched and widely used questionnaire for perceived usability evaluation. However, surprisingly few studies have used SUS to evaluate the perceived usability of learning management systems (LMSs). More...

6 avril 2016

Research Evaluation

LH Martin InstituteThis subject provides an overview of research evaluation and its place in science policy, and gives participants knowledge and insight in areas such as

  • The function of evaluation in science and the ways in which scientists, scientific processes and results are subject to evaluation
  • The institutional context of research evaluation in science policy and its function in governing
  • The science system organisationally, nationally and internationally
  • The type of evaluations that exist on different levels (project, program, institutional evaluations and rankings) as well as the tools used in evaluations (peer review and metrics)
  • The social and organisational impacts of evaluation on the science system
  • The ways in which evaluation can be studied scientifically
  • Various approaches to evaluation research. More...
4 avril 2016

Contrôle versus évaluation

Logo - Thot CursusPar Sylvie Jean. Corriger, évaluer, contrôler, noter. Des termes qui constituent le quotidien des enseignants, mais qui ne recouvrent pas la même réalité. Par habitude de langage ou raccourci pédagogique, on les assimile pour signifier la même idée : savoir si les apprenants apprennent ou non. Voir l'article...

Newsletter
49 abonnés
Visiteurs
Depuis la création 2 785 058
Formation Continue du Supérieur
Archives