Lessons from Mid-Century Soviet Higher Education
By . I’ve been reading Benjamin Tromly’s excellent book Making the Soviet Intelligentsia: Universities and Intellectual Life under Stalin and Khrushchev. It’s full of fascinating tidbits with surprising relevance to higher education dilemmas of the here and now. More...
Student/Graduate Survey Data
By . Back about 15 years ago, the relevant technology for email surveys became sufficiently cheap and ubiquitous that everyone started using them. I mean, everyone. So what has happened over the last decade and a half has been a proliferation of surveys and with it – surprise, surprise – a steady decline in survey response rates. We know that these low-participation surveys (nearly all are below 50%, and most are below 35%) are reliable, in the sense that they give us similar results year after year. But we have no idea whether they are accurate, because we have no way of dealing with response bias. More...
How to Think about “Better Higher Education Data”
By . Like many people, I am in favour of better data on the higher education sector. But while this call unites a lot of people, there is remarkably little thinking that goes into the question of how to achieve it. This is a problem, because unless we arrive at a better common understanding of both the cost and the utility of different kinds of data, we are going to remain stuck in our current position. More...
Data on Race/Ethnicity
By . A couple of week ago, CBC decided to make a big deal about how terrible Canadian universities were for not collecting data on race (see Why so many Canadian universities Know so little about their own racial diversity). As you all know, I’m a big proponent of better data in higher education. But the effort involved in getting new data has to be in some way proportional to the benefit derived from that data. And I’m pretty sure this doesn’t meet that test.
In higher education, there are only two points where it is easy to collect data from students: at the point of application, and at the point of enrolment. More...
The Meaning of Zero
By . I’ve had a lot of time over the past week to think about the federal budget. And the more I think about it, the more baffled I am about the decision to completely stuff the granting councils. I think it is either a sign of real political ineptness, or that something pretty awful is in the pipeline. More...
What’s Next for Student Aid
By . A few months ago, someone asked me what I wanted to see in the budget. I said i) investment in aboriginal PSE, ii) system changes for the benefit of mature students and iii) changes to loan repayment (specifically, a reduction of the maximum loan payment from 20% of disposable income to 15%). To my great pleasure, the government came through on two of those wishes. But there is still a lot of work to do yet. More...
Conflicting Views on Research Funding
By . Some people really like the graph and pass it around and re-tweet it because it shows that whatever governments say about their love for science and innovation, it’s not showing up in budgets. Others (hi Nassif!) dislike it because it doesn’t do justice to how badly researchers are faring under the current environment. Now, these critics have a point, but I think some of the criticism misunderstands why government funds research in the first place. More...
The Western China Dilemma
By . The South China Morning Post ran an interesting piece recently on the roll-out of China’s Thirteenth Five-Year Plan for Education. It suggested that in the central and western regions of the country – that is, the poorer, non-coastal bits – the bulk of the task of educational development , including higher education, is going to fall on the private sector. And yes, this is communist China we’re talking about. More...
Losing Count
By . Stop me if you’ve heard this story before: Canada is not sufficiently innovative, and part of the reason is that we don’t spend enough on research. It’s not that we don’t spend enough on *public* research; adjusted for GDP, we actually do above-average on that. What pulls us down is in international comparisons corporate R & D. Our narrow-minded, short-sighted, resource-obsessed business class spends far less on R&D than its equivalents in most other country, and that is what gives us such a low overall R&D spend. More...