Canalblog
Suivre ce blog Administration + Créer mon blog
Formation Continue du Supérieur
5 mai 2013

EASPA’s first Annual Conference 21 May 2013

http://ecampus.chem.auth.gr/easpa/images/easpa-small.jpgEASPA’s first Annual Conference 21 May 2013
The European Alliance for Subject-Specific Accreditation and Quality Assurance (EASPA) is very pleased to invite you to its first Annual Conference on the topic of “Subject-based Quality Assurance and Accreditation and its contribution to quality development and mobility” on Tuesday, 21st May 2013 at The International Association Center in Brussels, Belgium.
The conference will be a great opportunity to hear high-level speakers on all aspects of the topic. Robert Wagenaar will familiarize you with the latest developments in TUNING, which has spread to practically all parts of the world. The director of the American ASPA, a group of around 70 field specific Quality Assurance Agencies, will give an overview over the latest developments in disciplinary QA from the United States, you will hear about the example of developing sectoral standards in the ICT field, get an update on the role of professional cards in Europe and how they are related with accreditation issues and also be acquainted with the final conclusions of the Assessment of Higher Education Learning Outcomes (AHELO) project and its repercussions for the future. There will also be a lot of room for discussion with the participants as well as for learning about the aims and objectives of EASPA. Find out more about the Conference on EASPA’s website.
15 avril 2013

Accréditation: de nouvelles normes pour les écoles de commerce

http://www.e-orientations.com/imgs/orientation-etudes-metier-emploi.gifL'AACSB International, organisme habilité à accréditer de nouvelles écoles de commerce, a annoncé la publication d'un nouvel ensemble de normes à suivre pour que les écoles soient accréditées. Une manière de favoriser la flexibilité des formations, qui doivent suivre les évolutions du monde économique actuel.
Du nouveau en matière d'accréditations! L'AACSB International vient d'annoncer sa volonté de revoir l'ensemble des normes qui permettront à un établissement de se voir accréditer. Cette association, créée en 1916, a en effet pour mission de labelliser des écoles de commerce compétentes.
Et les nouvelles normes font l'unanimité, puisqu'elles ont été approuvées par les membres de l'association, lors de la conférence internationale réunie le 8 avril dernier à Chicago. Le but de ces normes est de redéfinir par le biais des écoles l'enseignement de la gestion, tout en se collant au plus près des besoins des entreprises. Suite de l'article...
http://www.e-orientations.com/imgs/orientation-etudes-metier-emploi.gifTá AACSB idirnáisiúnta creidiúnú comhlacht chumhacht ag scoileanna gnó nua, d'fhógair an scaoileadh sraith nua de chaighdeáin a leanúint do scoileanna a bheith creidiúnaithe. Níos mó...
14 avril 2013

Schedule for Recognition Review of Accrediting Organizations and Call for Third-Party Comment

cheaCOUNCIL FOR HIGHER EDUCATION ACCREDITATION - SCHEDULE FOR RECOGNITION REVIEW OF ACCREDITING ORGANIZATIONS and CALL FOR THIRD-PARTY COMMENT
These organizations will be reviewed at the June 10-11, 2013 meeting of the Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA) Committee on Recognition. Third-party comment must be received in the CHEA office no later than May 10, 2013 and may be submitted by mail, fax or email to:
Council for Higher Education Accreditation
One Dupont Circle, NW, Suite 510, Washington, DC 20036
Phone: 202-955-6126 - Fax: 202-955-6129 - Email: recognition@chea.org
Western Association of Schools and Colleges Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.
National Recreation and Park Association Council on Accreditation of Parks, Recreation, Tourism and Related Professions.
New England Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Institutions of Higher Education.
The Committee on Recognition meeting will take place at One Dupont Circle, Level 1B in Conference Room A.

CHEA recognition review includes an opportunity for parties independent of the accrediting organization under review to comment on whether the organization meets the CHEA recognition standards. Third-party comment may be either oral or written and is limited to the accrediting organization's efforts to meet the CHEA recognition standards. This may include commentary from many different sources, such as other accrediting organizations, institutions and programs, or professional or higher education associations. The comments will assist the CHEA Committee on Recognition as it considers the applications for recognition. A list of the committee on recognition members is provided here.
CHEA staff will review any third-party comment to assess its applicability to the recognition review. As provided in the 2006 and 2010 CHEA Recognition Policy and Procedures, third-party comments are reviewed by the CHEA Committee on Recognition.
"THIRD-PARTY COMMENT. Third-party comment may be either oral or written and is limited to the accrediting organization's efforts to meet the CHEA recognition standards.  All third parties requesting the opportunity to make comment related to an accrediting organization's recognition review are to notify CHEA staff and provide the names and affiliations of the persons requesting the opportunity to make third-party comment and a description of the organization(s) they represent. CHEA staff will review third-party requests for oral or written comment for completeness and applicability to eligibility and recognition standards.
Third parties who wish to appear for oral comment before the CHEA Committee on Recognition are to provide an outline of the proposed oral comment.  Where in the judgment of the Committee doing so may be useful, the Committee may invite third parties to appear before the Committee.  The accrediting organization will receive the outline of the proposed oral comment of third parties invited to appear.  Accrediting organizations will have the opportunity to review and respond to proposed oral comment.
Third parties wishing to make written comment are to provide the text of the third-party comment.  After review by CHEA staff, written comment will be provided to the Committee and the accrediting organization.  Accrediting organizations will have the opportunity to review and respond to written comment.
Third parties are to provide an outline of their oral comment or the text of their written comment in sufficient time to provide for review by CHEA staff, review and response by the accrediting organization, and for the outline or text to be provided to the Committee.
CHEA staff will notify all concerned parties of the location, date, and time of the public presentation."
13 avril 2013

Taking on Accreditors and Faculty

HomeBy Ry Rivard. Florida lawmakers advanced a bill this week intended to upend the American college accreditation system. The measure would allow Florida officials to accredit individual courses on their own -- including classes offered by unaccredited for-profit providers.
“We’re saying the monopoly of the accrediting system is not designed for the world of MOOCs or other individual courses,” said Republican State Senator Jeff Brandes, the bill’s sponsor. MOOCs are massive open online courses, the generally free online classes offered by a handful of groups, including some of the most elite universities in the world and for-profit companies. Read more...
7 avril 2013

Accreditors Without Borders

HomeBy Elizabeth Redden. American accrediting agencies are increasingly evaluating foreign colleges and programs that are unattached to U.S. institutions. Proponents of the exportation of U.S. accreditation argue that it has a role to play in improving the quality of universities and professional programs worldwide and in promoting the mobility of students and faculty; critics contend that, without care, the accreditors could find themselves in a compromising position.
They argue that the expansion of U.S. accreditation abroad is neocolonial on the one hand and hazardous on the other: can standards built on values underlying American higher education be upheld with integrity in other cultural contexts? Read more...

1 avril 2013

Comparative Perspectives

HomeBy Matt Reed. Next week I’m doing my first accreditation visit. I’ve been on the receiving end of three ten-year visits in my career - you’d think that wouldn’t be mathematically possible, but it is - but this will be my first time on the visiting side. I spent a chunk of this weekend plowing through the self-study, pen in hand. Already, I can see the value in it as a professional development exercise.  The college I’m visiting is in a different state than my own, so it has a different set of political variables to manage. It has its own history, its own local quirks, and its own challenges. Yet much of what it’s facing is simply a variation on what nearly everybody in public higher education is facing. And that’s where the professional development value comes in.
Unless you make a conscious effort not to, it’s easy for people on a given campus to think that its issues are unique to it. That’s true because most of the time, most people on campus aren’t made privy to, or interested in, comparative perspectives. They’re too busy focusing on their own work - to their credit - and it’s easier just to assume that whenever someone in administration makes some sort of reference to an external force, it’s just cover for a personal agenda. But much of the time, it isn’t.  And that becomes really obvious when you look beyond a single campus. Read more...
17 février 2013

The President's State of the Union Address and Accreditation

President Obama’s State of the Union address, delivered on February 12, 2013, generated unexpected attention to higher education accreditation. A document that accompanied the address, The President’s Plan For A Strong Middle Class & A Strong America, contained a section on “Holding colleges accountable for cost, value and quality” that stated:
“The President will call on Congress to consider value, affordability, and student outcomes in making determinations about which colleges and universities receive access to federal student aid, either by incorporating measures of value and affordability into the existing accreditation system; or by establishing a new, alternative system of accreditation that would provide pathways for higher education models and colleges to receive federal student aid based on performance and results.”
The suggestion that the federal government may consider a “new, alternative system of accreditation” was covered in publications including The Chronicle of Higher Education, Inside Higher Ed and USA Today, all of which quoted the Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA). It also generated stories critical of the current system of accreditation in publications such as the American Enterprise Institute’s AEI Ideas.
The articles noted the unexpected nature of this discussion of accreditation accompanying the State of the Union address, which CHEA President Judith Eaton termed “startling.” “We understand the importance of the issues of affordability,” Eaton told USA Today. “But all the talk has been about, 'We want to make the existing system [of accreditation] work differently,' not (that) 'We need a different system.'”
Eaton and others quoted in the various articles said that they were unsure what next steps would be for the Administration. However, Inside Higher Ed quoted Amy Laitinen, Deputy Director for Higher Education at the New America Foundation, saying that “I think it’s a pretty big signal of where they [the Administration] want to go.”
CHEA will follow this issue closely and will keep member institutions and recognized accrediting organizations informed on any developments.

16 février 2013

A New Accreditation System?

HomeBy Libby A. Nelson. In President Obama’s few sentences about higher education in the State of the Union address Tuesday night, there might have been a presidential precedent set: the first allusion to postsecondary accreditation in the landmark annual address to Congress.
In a domestic policy blueprint that accompanied the speech, Obama called for major changes to the nation’s system of accreditation -- changes that could upend the current system and provide a pathway for federal financial aid for competency-based learning, massive open online courses and other innovations. Obama called on Congress to either require existing accreditors to take value and quality into account when giving colleges their stamp of approval, or to create a new alternative system of accreditation that would bypass the old gatekeepers.
It’s that second possibility -- a route to federal financial aid that doesn’t pass through traditional accreditors -- that many, particularly those who favor new approaches to credit, found most intriguing. (And they blogged and columned and tweeted up a storm of enthusiasm as a result.) Such a system could open federal student aid to programs that give students credit based on prior learning or exams to prove competency. Read more...
16 février 2013

Accréditations, mode d’emploi

http://blog.educpros.fr/fiorina/wp-content/themes/longbeach_jfiorina/longbeach/images/img01.jpgSur le blog de Jean-François Fiorina. Les accréditations, éléments de visibilité et d’excellence internationaux, devenus obligatoires pour les grandes écoles de management, sont le fruit de choix stratégiques et de questionnement permanents. J’ai animé la Commission Qualité et Accréditations du Chapitre Ecoles de management de la Conférence des Grandes Ecoles en vue de la réalisation du Livre blanc « Accréditations internationales des business schools ». Objectif: faire partager le savoir faire et l’expérience reconnus des écoles de management françaises en la matière.
A quoi servent les accréditations?
Si les classements témoignent de la performance d’un établissement sur une année (la Commission européenne lance, d’ailleurs, son propre référentiel pour une classification universitaire sur sa zone, U-Ranking), les accréditations la mesure sur le moyen et long terme. Devenues indispensables, elles participent à l’élaboration de la stratégie des écoles. A ce titre, elles permettent de poser les bonnes questions et apparaissent comme des outils d’amélioration continue. Toutes différentes, elles n’en restent pas moins des éléments complémentaires et structurants d’un projet d’établissement. Les sites des structures d’accréditation: AASCB: www.aacsb.edu, EQUIS: www.efmd.org, AMBA: www.mbaworld.com, EPAS: www.efmd.org. Télécharger le Livre blanc. Suite de l'article...

http://blog.educpros.fr/fiorina/wp-content/themes/longbeach_jfiorina/longbeach/images/img01.jpg An blag de Jean-François Fiorina. Creidiúnú, eilimintí infheictheachta agus ardchaighdeán feabhais idirnáisiúnta, bhí éigeantach do scoileanna móra na bainistíochta, tá mar thoradh ar roghanna straitéiseacha agus ceistiú buan. Níos mó...

16 février 2013

Accréditations internationales des écoles de management

http://www.headway-advisory.com/blog/wp-content/themes/headway/images/logo.jpgPar Olivier Rollot.Accréditations internationales des écoles de management: le mode d’emploi de la CGE
« Au sein de la Conférence des Grandes écoles nous avons trois catégories d’écoles: celles déjà accréditées depuis longtemps, celles qui viennent de l’être ou sont en passe et celles qui n’y pensent pas forcément. Avec ce Livre blanc, nous avons voulu expliquer à toutes les processus», explique Jean-François Fiorina (photo), le directeur adjoint de Grenoble EM qui a animé le groupe auquel on doit la publication du Livre blanc « Accréditations internationales des business schools ».
Si les noms AACSB, Equis, Epas ou Amba sont entrés dans le vocabulaire commun des écoles de management, toutes ne savent en effet pas à quoi s’attendre si elles se lancent dans des processus qui peuvent prendre de 3 à 7 ans. « C’est un travail gigantesque, un véritable projet d’entreprise qui impacte tous les personnels et auquel les écoles doivent leur niveau actuel », reprend Jean-François Fiorina. Suite de l'article...
http://www.headway-advisory.com/blog/wp-content/themes/headway/images/logo.jpg By Olivier Rollot. International accreditation of business schools: the manual of the CGE. "Within the Conference of Colleges we have three categories of schools: those already accredited for a long time, those who come to be or are in and those who do not necessarily think. With this White Paper, we wanted to explain all the process, "explains Jean-François Fiorina (photo), deputy director of Grenoble EM who led the group to which we owe the publication of the White Paper "international business school accreditations". More...
<< < 10 20 30 31 32 33 34 > >>
Newsletter
49 abonnés
Visiteurs
Depuis la création 2 785 410
Formation Continue du Supérieur
Archives