Formation Continue du Supérieur

English
The English Profile programme is a collaborative research programme using corpus data and other tools to produce detailed RLDs for English.
Vocabulary RLDs for levels A1 to B2:  The English Profile Wordlists, available in 2011, will provide a complete searchable listing of the words and phrases in English that are considered to be within these levels.  They will offer reliable information at word and sense level, based on extensive analysis of word frequency and learner use, using the Cambridge International Corpus, the British National Corpus, the Cambridge Learner Corpus, together with other sources, including the Cambridge ESOL vocabulary lists and classroom materials.
Other researchers are focusing on the development of RLDs in the areas of grammar and language functions, using empirical data from corpora and curricula to describe learning goals.
English Profile is also developing the Cambridge English Profile Corpus, which will include essays, coursework and spoken data, collected from participating teachers' real or virtual classrooms.
Former specifications available online:

• Breakthrough specification (unpublished)
• Waystage 1990 (CUP)
• Threshold Level 1990 (CUP)
• Vantage (CUP)

Website: http://www.englishprofile.org/
Contact: englishprofle@cambridge.org

French
A French and international team was mandated to establish reference descriptions for French. Le Niveau B2 was published in 2004 and Le Niveau A1 in 2006 (éditions Didier ). A reference description for the first acquisitions in French (below A1) was published in 2005 by éditions Didier ((Niveau A1.1 pour le français - Référentiel et certification (DILF) pour les premiers acquis en français).
Each of these works comprises an audio CD presenting the oral implementations of the functions.
Planned: a specification of levels A2 and B1 as well as a website in order to place the first four levels on line (A1 to B2). This project is being conducted in co-operation with the Centre international d’études pédagogiques (CIEP– International Educational Research Centre) and the Organisation internationale de la francophonie (AIF –“Intergovernmental agency of the French-speaking world”). More...

The Language Policy Unit has developed a Guide for the production of RLDs aimed at assisting teams in developing an RLD for a national or regional language. It contains a series of examples that will be supplemented as further RLDs are finalised. A questionnaire is provided to enable teams to report on their work during the development of their reference level and to submit it in due course to the Council of Europe.

· Guide for the production of RLD
· Questionnaire

A seminar was held in Strasbourg in December 2005 for teams reporting on RDLs that have been finalised, are currently being developed, or are planned. Seventeen languages were represented. The seminar examined various approaches to designing RLDs as well as components (refer to see the Agenda of the seminar). More...

The Council of Europe has opted for helping to produce these instruments to complement the CEFRas part of its mainstream work. The descriptions must comprise the following common features:

• because the description of each level for each language emanates from the same document: the CEFR;
• because, together with the CEFR, the Manual for relating language examinations to the levels of the CEFR) and the videos/CD-Roms giving samples of levels for the setting of certification tests), these descriptions are one of the anchor points proposed by the Council of Europe’s Language Policy Unit for the development of language programmes that are consistent with one another, from one language to another and also with the common tools which already exist;
• because their convergence alone can give them credibility and make it worth people’s while to use them. It is unrealistic to imagine that the development of these reference descriptions, which select and distribute a certain verbal material by level of competence, can be based solely on “scientific” procedures: their audience will also depend on the consensus they are able to generate among the professionals concerned, especially as the Framework leaves decision makers the responsibility of specifying the morpho-syntactic material (See user box on page 115 in the English edition (CUP) of the CEFR).

Similarly to and following on from the threshold level, these CEFR level description by language are intended to provide extra legitimacy for languages which need to demonstrate that they can be taught and that their teaching can be defined in clear technical terms. More...

Launched in 2001, the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages marked a major turning point in describing specifications of language-learning targets; they were no longer designated as ‘threshold” or “Vantage level” etc, but by the appropriate level of the CEFR scale (A1 to C2).
The CEFR has been disseminated far and wide and has been translated into approximately 40 languages. It has now become a common reference instrument for organising language teaching and certification in many member States (see section on CEFR)
The CEFR is based on all these achievements and has developed a description of the process of mastering an unknown language by type of competence and sub-competence, using descriptors for each competence or sub-competence, on which we shall not go into further detail here. These descriptors were created without reference to any specific language, which guarantees their relevance and across-the-board applicability. The descriptors specify progressive mastery of each skill, which is graded on a six-level scale (A1, A2, B1, B2, C1, C2). However, for operators, textbook authors and teachers, the specification set out in the CEFR may appear excessively broad. Work began on drafting CEFRspecificationslanguage by language. This new generation of reference level descriptions (in groups of six) is based on the CEFRlevel descriptors: it is a case of identifying the forms of a given language (words, grammar, etc), mastery of which corresponds to the communicational, socio-linguistic, formal and other competences defined by the CEFR. These transpositions of the CEFR into a given language are known as Reference Level Descriptions (RLDs) for national and regional languages. More...

In order to meet the teaching and certification requirements, the level concept as defined was extended to cover specification of levels lying immediately below and above the threshold level. In the light of the developments in this field, particularly as regards the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR), some of which emerged at around the same time as the latter, other levels were formulated for a number of languages, paying particular attention, for instance, to socio-cultural components or learner autonomy, by pinpointing a possible definition for the concept of “learning to learn”. A lower level (Waystage) was created for English, as was a level situated above the threshold, also starting with English (Vantage Level). Other language versions then followed. The three ascending level descriptions (Waystage, Threshold and Vantage) provided a basis for designing programmes and producing multimedia courses and were developed in parallel with the CEFR. These proficiency levels constitute one of the origins of the six-level scale of the CEFR.
Learning target specifications (for the threshold and/or other levels) have been produced or updated for Basque, Catalan, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Estonian, French, Galician, German, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Norwegian, Portuguese, Romanian, Russian, Slovene, Spanish, and Welsh (see List of Publications). Plus...

The first specification of this “threshold level” was formulated for the English language (Threshold level, 1975), quickly followed by French (Un Niveau Seuil, 1976). These two instruments have been used de facto as models for the same type of reference instruments that were produced subsequently for other languages, but they were adapted to suit the peculiar features of each language. These threshold levels have also gradually changed, and they still play a major role in language teaching, often serving as the basis for new national teaching programmes. They help make the textbooks more motivating and facilitate development of more realistic and transparent evaluation systems.

· Compilation of Introductions and Prefaces to the series of level descriptions

A Compilation of Introductions and Prefaces to the series of level descriptions developed over a period of 30 years (1975 to 2005) provides an insight into how this tool has been developed and has been adapted for individual languages. Plus...

Some of the instruments produced within the Council of Europe have played a decisive role in the teaching of so-called “foreign” languages by promoting methodological innovations and new approaches to designing teaching programmes. They have facilitated a fresh approach to communicating these teaching methods in a manner potentially more conducive to operational appropriation of unknown languages and therefore to “freedom of movement of persons and ideas”. Accordingly, from around the mid-1970s onwards, specialists worked out an operational model for abilities which specific groups of learners (tourists, businesspersons, migrants, etc) require for using a language for independent communication in a country in which this language is the everyday medium for communication. By thus identifying these groups’ language needs they were able to pinpoint the knowledge and know-how required for attaining this communication “threshold”.

Brief background

· Instruments for language description: the concept of threshold level
· Compilation of Introductions and Prefaces to the series of level descriptions
· Beyond the ‘threshold level’

From ‘threshold levels’ to Reference Level Descriptions (RLD)

· The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR): an instrument for plurilingual education
· Reference Level Descriptions (RLDs) for national and regional languages
· Relationship between Council of Europe reference instruments for language teaching/learning

Current Developments

List of Reference Level Descriptions (finalised or currently being developed)
Compilation of Introductions and Prefaces to the series of level descriptions

Guide for the production of RLD. Plus...

By Yoel Finkelman and Ofir Haim. A few weeks before Rosh Hashanah sometime in the 11^th century, a distraught, young Jewish Afghani young man named Yair sent a painful letter to his brother-in-law, Abu-al-Hasan Siman Tov. Life had dealt Yair a tough hand, or maybe it was just his own bad choices. Having failed in business in his hometown of Bamiyan, rumors were now spreading that he had “broken promises . . . regarding property” and that he did not truly “observe the Sabbath.” Leaving these problems behind him, he had left his young wife to move some 150 miles to Ghazni and begin anew. More...

Centre européen pour les langues vivantes (CELV)

Accord partiel élargi du Conseil de l’Europe (Graz) - www.ecml.at
Le CELV (33 Etats membres) a pour mission la mise en œuvre des politiques linguistiques – élaborées dans le cadre du Programme Politiques linguistiques (Strasbourg) – et la promotion d’approches innovantes à l’enseignement et l’apprentissage des langues vivantes. Le Centre organise en particulier des projets en matière d’éducation aux langues se traduisant par des ateliers ou séminaires et offre une plateforme de coopération avec des experts, des associations et des institutions.

Autres partenaires

Commission européenne

Organe exécutif de l’Union européenne (Bruxelles) qui veille à l’application des dispositions des traités et des décisions prises par les institutions de l’Union.
 Section Education et Formation

ALTE - The Association of Language Testers in Europe (L'Association des organismes certificateurs en Europe) (statut participatif auprès du Conseil de l'Europe)

 www.alte.org
Association d’institutions au sein de l’Europe qui produisent des examens et des certifications pour les apprenants en langues. Chaque membre fournit des examens de la langue parlée en tant que langue maternelle dans leur pays ou région.

Conseil européen pour les langues (CDL)

 www.celelc.org
Association permanente et indépendante, le CEL est une niche unique dans le panorama linguistique en Europe par ses contacts avec les universités, institutions de langues, le Conseil de l’Europe et la Commission, en assurant une médiation à divers niveaux pour envisager, anticiper et adapter le paysage linguistique dans une vision à long terme

EALTA  - Association européenne pour la conception de tests et l’évaluation en langue (statut participatif auprès du Conseil de l'Europe) 

  www.ealta.eu.org
Une association professionnelle destinée aux concepteurs de tests et l’évaluation en langues en Europe. Son objectif est de promouvoir la compréhension des principes théoriques de l’élaboration de tests et de l’évaluation en langues ainsi que l’amélioration et le partage des pratiques concernant les tests et l’évaluation à travers l’Europe.

EAQUALS - Evaluation & Accreditation of Quality in Language Services (Evaluation et accréditation de la qualité des services des langues) (statut participatif auprès du Conseil de l'Europe) 

 www.eaquals.org (site en anglais)
Association paneuropéenne d’instances de formation en langues, visant à promouvoir et garantir la qualité dans les institutions d’enseignement des langues vivantes. Plus...

Sélection d’autres documents liés au CECR

Inventaire linguistique des contenus clés aux niveaux du CECR. 2015. Eaquals et CIEP, Paris. www.eaquals.org

Du communicatif à l’actionnel: Un cheminement de recherche. 2014. Enrica Piccardo. FR  EN

The CEFR in Practice - English Profile Studies. 2014. Brian North. Cambridge University Press (Series editors: Michael Milanovic, Nick Saville) EN

Core inventory for General English 2010. Eaquals and British Council. 2010. www.eaquals.org

From Communicative to Action-Oriented: New perspectives for a New Millenium. CONTACT TESL Ontario 36(2),20-35 EN

Relating Language Examinations to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Case studies and reflections on the use of the Council of Europe's Draft Manual. 2010. Waldemar Martinyuk (Ed.). Cambridge: Studies in Language Testing Series, Cambridge University Press.

CEFR Curriculum Case Studies: Examples from different contexts of implementing Can do descriptors from the Common European Framework of Reference. 2008. EAQUALS. www.eaquals.org

Guide de l'utilisateur pour l'assurance qualité et la maîtrise de la qualité. 1999. Peter Brown & Frank Heyworth (EAQUALS) FR EN. Plus...