The White House on Thursday morning released details of President Obama’s plan to make college more affordable, with a proposal that seeks to measure colleges’ performance through a new ratings system. Following are highlights of a White House fact sheet on Mr. Obama’s plan, released in advance of his speech at the University at Buffalo that will address college affordability:
• Before the 2015 academic year, the U.S. Department of Education will “develop a new ratings system to help students compare the value offered by colleges and encourage colleges to improve. These ratings will compare colleges with similar missions and identify colleges that do the most to help students from disadvantaged backgrounds as well as colleges that are improving their performance.” The ratings will be based on factors including access, such as the percentage of students receiving Pell Grants; affordability, such as average tuition rates; and outcomes, such as graduation rates and graduates’ earnings.
• The results, the White House said, will be published on the department’s College Scorecard, which itself was met with mixed reviews from many in higher education.
• The plan seeks eventually to tie financial aid to the results of the new rating system: “In the upcoming reauthorization of the Higher Education Act, the president will seek legislation allocating financial aid based on these college ratings by 2018, once the ratings system is well established. Students can continue to choose whichever college they want, but taxpayer dollars will be steered toward high-performing colleges that provide the best value.”
• According to the White House fact sheet, Mr. Obama will seek to reward colleges with a bonus for the number of Pell Grant recipients they graduate, and to require colleges with high dropout rates to disburse Pell Grants over the course of the semester, rather than in lump sums at the beginning of the semester.
The White House’s fact sheet also said that Mr. Obama would challenge colleges to embrace certain higher-education innovations as a way to drive down costs, including competency-based programs, massive open online courses, popularly known as MOOCs, and “flipped” classrooms.
Read the whole thing here, and follow along as The Chronicle gathers reactions to the president’s proposals from higher education throughout the day.

By Paul Basken. Not long after he proposed giving researchers $100-million to improve fundamental understandings of brain function, President Obama was worried. How, Mr. Obama asked his bioethics commission last month, might improved technologies for reading the brain affect society in areas that include personal privacy, moral and legal accountability, stigmatization, discrimination, and measures of intelligence?
On Tuesday the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues began tackling that question. And, at least on its first pass at the subject, it largely counseled calm. More...

By Beckie Supiano. Twenty-six percent of high-school graduates who took the ACT in 2013 met all four of its college-readiness benchmarks, according to a report released on Wednesday by ACT Inc., the organization that administers the test. The benchmarks were designed by ACT to indicate the minimum scores needed on each subject it tests to signify a 50-percent chance of earning a B or higher, or a 75-percent chance of earning a C or higher, in corresponding first-year college courses. The report, “The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2013,” considers the scores of the 54 percent of 2013 high-school graduates—about 1.8 million people—who took the ACT. More...

By Kelly Field. President Obama continues his three-campus "college cost" bus tour on Friday, promoting his plans to make college more affordable through a mix of carrots and sticks. The heart of the proposals is a controversial plan to rate colleges based on measures of access, affordability, and student outcomes, and to allocate aid based on those ratings. Under the plan, students attending higher-rated institutions could obtain larger Pell Grants and more-affordable loans. The Obama administration and its supporters say the ratings would empower consumers with fresh information and would pressure colleges to keep costs down. They describe a "datapalooza," in which prospective students would be able to compare institutions on measures such as debt levels, graduation and transfer rates, and graduates' earnings. More...

By Goldie Blumenstyk. President Obama took a swipe at law schools and for-profit colleges on Friday, the second day of his college bus tour, suggesting that legal education could be just as effective if it took two years rather than three, and assailing proprietary colleges that leave students in debt and ill prepared for a job.
At some for-profit colleges, students are "loaded down with enormous debt," said Mr. Obama, speaking at a Binghamton University town-hall event. "They can't find a job. They default. The taxpayer ends up holding the bag. Their credit is ruined, and the for-profit institution is making out like a bandit. That's a problem." More...

By Dan Berrett, Goldie Blumenstyk, Sara Lipka, Marc Parry, and Beckie Supiano. Many of the ideas embraced by President Obama in his call to control college costs have longstanding champions in major foundations and among prominent policy analysts. The president's plan dovetails closely with the agendas of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, which has spent $472-million to remake college education in the United States, and of the Lumina Foundation, the largest private foundation devoted solely to higher education. Many features of the president's plan have been advocated, too, in the research and analysis of the New America Foundation's education-policy program. The Gates Foundation and its major grantees have focused, for example, on the idea of tying aid for colleges to their performance, a cornerstone of the president's plan. At the state level, Gates grantees like Complete College America and Jobs for the Future have been pushing efforts to tie colleges' budgets to factors like graduation rates. And at the federal level, the foundation's Reimagining Aid Design and Delivery project has supported research on using financial aid as a lever to improve student success. More...

By Rob Goodman. Nineteen days after the world failed to end, blood stopped flowing to the brain of Harold Camping, prophet of doom. Had he felt his stroke coming as he confidently forecast apocalypse? Maybe not; maybe he had no more foresight into his own demise than the demise of the world. Or maybe he had simply confused the two—after all, he was approaching his 90th birthday, and his own mortality couldn't have seemed far off when, on national billboards and his own radio network, he set a date (May 21, 2011) for the end of days. For some, it is a short mental step from "my end is imminent" to "the end of everything is imminent." Call it apocalyptic narcissism.
We flatter ourselves when we imagine a world incapable of lasting without us in it—a world that, having ceased to exist, cannot forget us, discard us, or pave over our graves. Even if the earth no longer sits at the center of creation, we can persuade ourselves that our life spans sit at the center of time, that our age and no other is history's fulcrum. More...

Von Christine Xuân Müller. Professoren brauchen keine Beratung, hieß es lange. Das Hochschulmagazin "duz" zeigt, dass auch etablierte Forscher lernen müssen, in Uni-Hierarchien voran zu kommen. Doktoranden hilft der Coach auch bei der Frage: Abbrechen oder weitermachen?
Wer Raum 2.06 der Hochschule für Wirtschaft und Recht Berlin (HWR) betritt, taucht ein in eine untypische Büroatmosphäre. Das kleine Zimmer versprüht Wohnzimmercharme: Duft von frisch gebrühtem Ingwer-Orange-Kräutertee liegt in der Luft, warme, freundliche Beleuchtung, Naturfotos an den Wänden und dezente klassische Musik. Kreisförmig angeordnete Stühle mit weichen Kissen laden zum Verweilen ein. Mehr...

Von Annika Sartor. Wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiter sind meistens befristet angestellt – warum eigentlich?
Wie geht es dem wissenschaftlichen Nachwuchs?
Mit den Inhalten ihrer Arbeit sind angehende Forscher meistens zufrieden – mit ihren Arbeitsverträgen nicht: Neun von zehn wissenschaftlichen Mitarbeitern sind befristet angestellt. Dazu gehören nicht nur Doktoranden, sondern auch längst promovierte oder sogar habilitierte Wissenschaftler, die schon jahrelang an der Uni arbeiten. Wer keine Professur ergattert, kann theoretisch bis zum Rentenalter über Zeitverträge beschäftigt werden. Mehr...

Von Matthias Stolz. Zum Studienbeginn einen Bonus von der Stadt erhalten klingt verlockend. Und ist in einigen Teilen Deutschlands üblich. Wo, zeigt die Karte. Wenn sie gerade angefangen haben zu studieren, scheuen Studenten gewöhnlich den Gang zum Einwohnermeldeamt. Es gibt Wichtiges zu tun in den ersten Tagen, Ersti-Partys, Ikea-Einkäufe – wäre doch schade, die eben erst erlangte Freiheit durch Ämtergänge zu vergeuden. Mehr...