The International Network for Quality Assurance Agencies in Higher Education (INQAAHE) is a world-wide association of over 200 organisations active in the theory and practice of quality assurance in higher education. The great majority of its members are quality assurance agencies that operate in many different ways, although the Network also welcomes (as associate members) other organisations that have an interest in QA in HE. The link address is: http://www.inqaahe.org/
Private institution passes QAA review
By John Morgan. Richmond, the American International University in London has become one of the rare private providers to pass a full review by the quality watchdog. Not-for-profit Richmond – which describes itself as an international, liberal arts, and business studies institution and has around 1,000 students – has undergone a successful institutional review by the Quality Assurance Agency. Publicly-funded universities must undergo institutional review by the QAA. However, it is not an automatic requirement for private providers. Richmond, whose UK degrees are validated by the Open University, underwent its review voluntarily.. More...
QAA guides universities on information to students
By John Morgan. Ensuring prospective students get accurate information on workload, class sizes and teaching is the aim of new guidance from the quality watchdog. The Quality Assurance Agency’s guidance is aimed at supporting universities and colleges in making information available to current and prospective students, and at advising students on the questions to ask about teaching when applying for a course. “There is now more choice than ever before of where and what to study, and universities and colleges need to get it right in the information they provide to their current and future students,” said Jayne Mitchell, director of research, development and partnerships at the QAA. More...
Collaborative Provision in HE: Enhancing Standards & Quality
- Melinda Drowley, Head of Standards, Quality and Enhancement, QAA
- Gareth Parry, Professor of Education, University of Sheffield
- Ann Minton, Senior Workforce Development Fellow, University of Derby
- Roger Woods, Assistant Pro-Vice-Chancellor for Internationalisation & former Provost of Ningbo campus, University of Nottingham
- Colin Raban, Emeritus Professor, University of Derby & Director, Academic Quality Management Ltd (Chair)
The Context and Issues:
With universities operating in an environment characterised by heightened student expectations and international expansion, collaborative provision of higher education is coming under serious regulatory scrutiny. What more can HEIs do to ensure existing and prospective partnerships safeguard academic standards, are governed appropriately and dovetail with key institutional objectives?
By attending this Policy and Practice Briefing you will learn about:
- Strategy: ensuring partnerships serve institutional objectives
- Key responsibilities: upholding academic standards & the quality of learning
- Funding: adapting to changes to student number controls & funding
- Partners: working effectively with private providers & employers
- Planning: examining business cases, due diligence & risk assessment
- Fair admissions: recruiting with integrity in an increasingly competitive sector
- Public knowledge: making information accurate, readily available & appropriate
- Overseas partners: selecting partners, achieving objectives & avoiding pitfalls
- Establishing a partnership: how to respond to challenges likely to arise?
- Private sector involvement: how can universities take advantage of new trends?
Objectives and Outcomes:
Develop your understanding of current and future policy. The morning session will provide a chance to discuss the latest policy developments affecting collaborative provision of HE.
Learn from organisations that are successfully putting policy into practice. Taking part in the afternoon session will allow you to examine case studies of successful initiatives in detail.
Who Should Attend?
Delegates will be drawn from stakeholders including: universities, colleges, alternative providers, employers, relevant central Government departments and agencies.
Sponsorship and Exhibition Opportunities:
This Westminster Briefing offers your organisation a platform to profile its services to your target audience and key decision makers. There are a number of packages available, from aligning your organisation alongside the conference as a sponsor to exhibiting at the event. Please contact melanie.archer@westminster-briefing.com for details or download a booking form.
Asia-Pacific Quality Network (APQN)
The Asia-Pacific Quality Network (APQN) has been developed with the purpose of serving the needs of quality assurance agencies in higher education in a region that contains over half the world's population. APQN is already helping to build alliances between agencies, and assisting countries/territories that do not have a quality assurance agency of their own. The link address is: http://www.apqn.org/
Arab Network for Quality Assurance in Higher Education
The Arab Network for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ANQAHE) has been established in June, 2007 as a nonprofit nongovernmental organization. The purpose to establish the Arab network for quality Assurance in higher education is to create a mechanism between the Arab countries.
The link address is: http://www.anqahe.org/
Enhancement of Quality Assurance Management in Jordanian Universities - EQuAM
The University of Barcelona is launching a new project entitled "Enhancement of Quality Assurance Management in Jordanian Universities" (EQuAM), in partnership with ENQA and 15 other higher education bodies.
A model (principles, priorities, guidelines and procedures) will be produced to support Jordanian HEIs and their quality assurance unit to improve internal QA in line with the new requirements of the national HE Accreditation Council and international expectations. The Model will be based on analyses of needs and capacities in Jordanian HEIs, as well as the experiences and best practices from the successful QA Action Line of the Bologna Process. Workshops, consultations and “matching” exercises will contribute relevant material from Jordanian and European HEIs and QA agencies. The Model will be piloted in Jordanian HEIs and complemented by training and capacity building to support its sustainability. European experiences in building productive relationships between HEIs and their QA agencies will inform the effective implementation of the Model and reflect the importance of autonomous HEIs meeting national/international expectations whilst working in different contexts.
Quality of Education and Cost of Tuition Increase in Costa Rica
By . Costa Rica’s prized quality of life in the Central American region owes a lot to her focus on education. Since there is no military to spend money on, Costa Rica has had an opportunity to invest a greater portion of the national budget on academic affairs -particularly at the higher education level. As such, the number of colleges and universities in Costa Rica has increased along with the diversity and quality of educational offerings. The cost of tuition, however, is also on the rise. According to a recent report by Central American business magazine Summa, Costa Rica ranks as the best country for higher education in Central America. These findings come from the 2013 QS Quacquarelli Symonds ranking of the best universities in Latin America, where the University of Sao Paulo in Brazil tops the list. Read more...
A Guide to Quality in Online Learning
"A Guide to Quality in Online Learning” is designed to provide insight into opportunities presented by online learning. Structured in the form of 16 frequently asked questions, the publication launched in June 2013 summarizes the key quality issues in online education in a concise and accessible manner.Edited by renowned higher education experts Stamenka Uvalić-Trumbić and Sir John Daniel and authored by Neil Butcher and Merridy Wilson-Strydom, this newly published guide from Academic Partnerships is available to download for free in both English and Chinese.
The guide an additional reading list focused on quality benchmarks and international best practices.
Website: Academic Partnerships.
New ECA project: Certificate for the Quality of Internationalisation (CeQuint)
CeQuInt will provide programmes and institutions insight into their level and quality of internationalisation and provide them, where necessary, with recommendations for improvements. The project currently develops an assessment framework that focuses on improvement and excellence, and which builds on NVAO's experience with the assessment of internationalisation.
The assessment framework (i.e. methodology) will be used to assess the quality of internationalisation at either the level of a programme or an institution. The framework and methodology will be tested in a series of twelve pilot procedures, of which four at institutional level and eight at programme level. The experts taking part in the assessment panels will be trained before these procedures start. The pilot procedures will be used to test and evaluate the developed assessment framework from the perspective of both the experts as well as the assessed programmes and institutions. The feedback and results will be used to amend and finalise the assessment methodology.
A positive assessment by an assessment panel will lead to the award by ECA of the Certificate for Quality in Internationalisation. This certificate confirms that a programme or institution has successfully included a significant international and/or intercultural dimension in the purpose, function and delivery of its education. The Certificate for Quality in Internationalisation is intended to lead to a substantial improvement in the transparency and level of internationalisation.
HE institutions will be kept informed about the progress of the project through a newsletter, stakeholder meetings, workshops, conferences and publications. In addition, a platform will be developed to share good practices in the field of internationalisation as identified by assessment panels.
Since the start of the project in October 2012, the project partners have given specific attention to the further definition of assessment methodology, the identification of candidates for the pilot procedures, the specific roles and profiles of experts in the assessment panels and the commencement of dissemination activities. The immediate agreed actions include a stronger involvement of experts from the professional field in the assessment panels, the introduction of a core group of experts that will take part in several pilot procedures and the reporting of national and international dissemination activities. You can find more information here.
