By . First of all, we are getting a lot of new data at the international level. There are two primary sources for this. The first is the THE rankings – in particular their new European Teaching Rankings, which use surveys to look at student engagement and the student experience. This is excellent. It’s not the first time this has been attempted – U-Multirank has done this for a couple of years now – but THE taking up this data brings this approach into some of the world’s largest universities (THE also did something similar in its US rankings). More...
Academic Service (Third Mission)
By . On Friday, I talked a little bit about rankings which looked at universities’ “Third Mission”. This is a new term for many North American readers, but it’s not much different than when we use “service” at an institutional level rather than an individual level. But the notion of “service” is itself a pretty slippery one, so perhaps it is of interest to delve into this topic a bit. More...
2003-04: The Historical Hinge of International Rankings
By . While national rankings were old hat, the Shanghai Rankings’ global nature was something genuinely new. The sadly-defunct magazine Asiaweek had tried doing a regional ranking in the late 1990s but it failed because – like US News and Maclean’s – they relied on a methodology which required institutional participation and once a few big institutions say no, the whole thing fell apart. More...
LinkedIn and the Future of New Credentials
By . One of the many unrealized promises of the last decade or so has been the idea that the types of credentials available to student – micro-credentials, stacked credentials Coursera-style “specializations”, whatever – would proliferate. More...
HEQCO’s Intriguing Skills Report
By . HEQCO produced a fascinating report on skills last week, which I want to explore in depth. Unfortunately, it has put a few people’s backs up because of a couple of poorly-chosen sentences in a covering press release, which I will also explore. More...
Skills not Research
By . The Logic, a new subscription journalism outlet dedicated to Canadian innovation and tech policy, had a couple of great stories about a month ago that are worth highlighting simply to remember the general poverty of the standard U-15/Universities Canada line about higher education and economic growth. More...
2018 Online Learning Review: Emerging technologies
By . This is the third of five posts reviewing developments in online learning during 2018. The first looked at AI and synchronous learning, and the second looked at open universities and open education. All are based on reflections of my work during 2018. More...2018 review: open universities and open education
By . 2018 was not a good year for open and/or distance teaching universities, at least in several of the more economically advanced countries. The expansion of conventional universities into online learning, and government funding policies, have resulted in student enrolment in open or distance teaching universities falling dramatically or at least stagnating while online enrolments in the rest of the system grow rapidly. More...A review of AI and synchronous online learning in 2018
By . Although I’m trying to retire, or at least ease up a little, 2018 turned out to be a really busy work year for me. In the end, my various activities did allow me to get a pretty good view of what’s going on in online learning, at least in Canada, although any report such as this is going to be partial and personal. More...Another perspective on AI in higher education
By . This report is by Learning House, an online program management service recently acquired by John Wiley and Sons. The authors surveyed four key areas in higher education and the opportunities for growth in the near and distant future. More...