Reminders about the Economics of Becoming an Academic
Les débuts de carrière des jeunes diplômés, très touchés par la crise
La crise a bel et bien perturbé les nouveaux venus sur le marché du travail. Le Céreq vient en effet de publier de nouvelles enquêtes réalisées auprès de la Génération 1998, ainsi que de la Génération 2004. Les jeunes diplômés ne sont pas égaux en termes de salaires…
Le Céreq vient de dévoiler deux enquêtes sur l'insertion des jeunes: l'une qui concerne les jeunes diplômés de 2004 et interrogés en 2007, 2009 puis 2011; et l'autre relative aux diplômés de 1998 et interrogés successivement en 2001, 2003 et 2005. Ces enquêtes croisées révèlent que les non-diplômés ont, sans surprise, bénéficié de statuts précaires. Mais les diplômés du supérieur ont, eux, également été fortement touchés par la crise… Suite de l'article...
The crisis has indeed disrupted the new entrants to the labor market. Céreq has just released new surveys of Generation 1998 and Generation 2004. Graduates are not equal in terms of wages. More...
Pitching “the pitch”
1) If the conversation is going to last more than 10 minutes, it might just make sense to make your pitch right at the start. In fact, forget about it being a pitch – it’s an introduction to who you are in the context of the work you want to do. So, when you’re launching that informational interview, go ahead and say why you’re considering the career that you are, and what made you think you might be good at it. This helps shape the direction of the conversation and lets the other person know why you’re there. Read more...
Self-Sabotage in the Academic Career
By Robert J. Sternberg. 15 ways in which faculty members harm their own futures, often without knowing it. Pogo recognized long ago that we often are our own worst enemies. Sure, he was a cartoon character, but he had a point—especially in higher education, where self-sabotage seems to be a standard characteristic of academic careers. In my 30 years as a professor, five years as a dean, and three years as a provost, I have observed many academics harm their own careers, often without realizing it. Here are 15 ways in which you can be most self-destructive.1. You don't seek out multiple mentors. Too many faculty members sit back and wait for guidance and advice from their department heads or promotion committees. Successful academics, early in their careers, look for several mentors, including from departments other than their own. No one person or committee can be relied on to give you definitive career advice. In the end, you need to seek out multiple sources of advice, sort the good from the bad, and take responsibility for your own career development. Read more...
Reinventing the wheel
Feature: For richer, for poorer
By Amanda Goodall. For a sustained period in the 1960s, Harvard University had to cope with what today would be called a problem of human resources. A member of its philosophy department was noticeably unproductive. Years came. Years went. The arts faculty began to grumble. Their philosophy colleague’s lack of scholarly activity was, they felt, unacceptable in a modern university. The corridor talk grew; early whispers transmuted into a desire for the university to face the fact that this man was now, pretty plainly, a dud. Read more...The factors UK academics consider most important for promotion
By Elizabeth Gibney. Research and publication is by far the most important factor in career advancement, according to a survey of academics. The view was consistent across all disciplines, but was felt more strongly by those from high- and medium-ranked departments, as measured by the percentage of research rated as 4* in the research assessment exercise. The survey of almost 22,000 academics asked respondents to score each of five factors according to their importance in career advancement, giving each factor a weight from one to five. Read more...Choosing an Adviser Who Can Help You Leave Academe
'Risk' and Reward
By Trenda Boyum-Breen. The number of career changes an average person makes in their lifetime is on the rise, including for higher education professionals. The decision to leave your current institution for a new one is likely not easy; now imagine crossing over to a new sector. In my first column I mentioned my decision to join other colleagues in higher education who have taken the risk to cross sectors from traditional higher education to for-profit. A reader picked up on me using the term “risk” and asked if I would expand on that. In general when I contemplated a move to a new institution, I reflected on the “fit” between what I brought to the table (both personally and professionally) and what the organization brought to the table (mission, culture, scope of the position, vision, location, reputation, etc.). Read more...