Canalblog
Suivre ce blog Administration + Créer mon blog
Formation Continue du Supérieur
3 février 2013

U-Multirank, la réponse européenne aux classements des universités, plusieurs sont sceptiques

LeMonde.frPar Isabelle Rey-Lefebvre. La Commission Européenne lance officiellement, mercredi 30 janvier, à Dublin, dans le cadre de la présidence irlandaise de l’Union Européenne, son classement de 500 universités européennes et du monde entier, appelé U-Multirank. Un premier palmarès, partiel puisque ne couvrant que quatre champs disciplinaires (éco-gestion, physique, ingénieries mécanique et électrique) devrait paraître au début de l’année 2014.
L’Europe entend ainsi prendre ses distances avec les classements déjà connus, comme ceux de Shangaï ou du magazine Times Higher Education, où la réputation dans le domaine de la recherche est prépondérante.  "C’est une approche nouvelle qui donnera aux étudiants et aux établissements un aperçu clair de leurs performances, dans une série de domaines clefs", assure Androulla Vassiliou, commissaire européenne à l’éducation. Suite de l'article...

LeMonde.fr De réir Isabelle Rey-Lefebvre. Seolann An Coimisiún Eorpach go hoifigiúil Dé Céadaoin, 30 Eanáir, Baile Átha Cliath, faoi Uachtaránacht na hÉireann ar an Aontas Eorpach, ar a dtugtar a rangú de 500 ollscoil san Eoraip agus ar fud an domhain, U-Multirank. Níos mó...

3 février 2013

U-Multirank is launched, 500 universities expected to sign up

http://enews.ksu.edu.sa/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/UWN.jpgBy Alan Osborn. A new university ranking system, U-Multirank, was officially launched by the European Union (EU) in Dublin on Wednesday, bringing a new and broader approach to the assessment of universities throughout the world. Some 500 universities worldwide are expected to sign up to U-Multirank, and the first results will be published in early 2014.
U-Multirank will rate universities in five separate areas: reputation for research, quality of teaching and learning, international orientation, success in knowledge transfer – such as partnerships with businesses, and start-ups – and contribution to regional growth. The aim, said Androulla Vassiliou, the European commissioner for education, is to give students and institutions a clear picture of their performance across a range of important areas. Read more...
28 janvier 2013

Degrees ranked by earning potential

By Jody O'Callaghan. University degrees are being ranked by officials according to their earning potential. A Ministry of Education report, Moving On Up - What Young People Earn After Their Tertiary Education, compares what graduates earn after studying different subjects and at different levels in New Zealand.
It coincides with the launch of a tool on the careers.govt.nz website today that uses up-to-date tertiary qualifications data and information from Inland Revenue to give potential students a frank outlook of different careers.
Five years after leaving university, a medicine graduate is earning about three times the average $35,500 salary of a performing arts graduate, according to the report. An engineer earns $58,287.
Tertiary Education, Skills and Employment Minister Steven Joyce said the new report and website offered important, real information about New Zealand's industries. Read more...

28 janvier 2013

EU rolls out university ranking

By Ian Mundell. U-Multirank aims to correct a perceived bias towards research performance.
Plans to roll out a new system of rankings for Europe's universities to encourage international comparison will be outlined next week at a conference in Dublin. The system, called U-Multirank, has been developed with funding from the European Union. It aims to correct a perceived bias towards research performance in other international rankings, and so present a more balanced picture of university activities.
The goal is to persuade at least 500 universities to opt into the first phase of the system. Most will be from Europe, with a small number of international institutions included for comparison. The first ranking would be published early in 2014. The perceived research bias of existing rankings – principally the Shanghai Academic Ranking of World Universities and the Times Higher Education World University Ranking – is seen as problematic because it fails to recognise that universities may have other goals and their users may have other priorities. The EU initiative aims to bring out these other university activities and allow institutions to be compared accordingly. Read more...
25 janvier 2013

EU rolls out university ranking

http://www.europeanvoice.com/Css/images/logo.gifBy Ian Mundell. U-Multirank aims to correct a perceived bias towards research performance.
Plans to roll out a new system of rankings for Europe's universities to encourage international comparison will be outlined next week at a conference in Dublin. The system, called U-Multirank, has been developed with funding from the European Union. It aims to correct a perceived bias towards research performance in other international rankings, and so present a more balanced picture of university activities.
The goal is to persuade at least 500 universities to opt into the first phase of the system. Most will be from Europe, with a small number of international institutions included for comparison. The first ranking would be published early in 2014. The perceived research bias of existing rankings – principally the Shanghai Academic Ranking of World Universities and the Times Higher Education World University Ranking – is seen as problematic because it fails to recognise that universities may have other goals and their users may have other priorities. The EU initiative aims to bring out these other university activities and allow institutions to be compared accordingly. Read more...
13 janvier 2013

Rankings and the Visibility of Quality Outcomes in the European Higher Education Area

logoHigher Education Conference - "Rankings and the Visibility of Quality Outcomes in the European Higher Education Area". 30.01.2013 - 31.01.2013.
The subject of this conference is higher education ranking systems with a particular focus on the needs of different users. The conference will also focus on the Commission's U-Multi-rank project and will provide an opportunity for the consortium leading this project to provide clarity to institutions and policy makers around the opportunities, challenges and requirements of the project.
Expected participants include representatives of the various users of rankings systems including students, institutional leaders, academics, enterprise leaders and policy makers.
Aoife Conduit, Assistant Principal, Higher Education Division.
T: +353 1889 22 65. E: aoife_conduit@education.gov.ie.
11 janvier 2013

Top 100 Chinese universities in 2013

By Lu Na. In the 2013 China University Rankings recently published by Chinese researcher Wu Shulian and his team China University Assessment, six C9 League members claimed the top six spots of the list, demonstrating the league's lasting clout in China's education system.
The list was based on four indexes that reflect the quality of a university: average academic level of teachers, teachers' performance, quality of freshman and quality of undergraduate students.
The China University Rankings, originally launched in 1993, examine 706 Chinese universities in overall strength, student cultivation and research programs, in order to provide multiple angles for students and their parents to compare and choose the most suitable university for their children. Read more...
11 janvier 2013

Einflussreich und umstritten: Die Macht der Hochschulrankings

Immer mehr Länder machen politische Entscheidungen von den Bestenlisten abhängig - Gleichzeitig nimmt Kritik an Methodik zu.
Wien - Times Higher Education (THE), QS, Shanghai - internationale Uni-Rankings gewinnen immer mehr Einfluss auf politische Entscheidungen: Sie sind Kriterium für Hochschulkooperationen, Vergabe von Stipendien für Auslandsaufenthalte und sogar Aufenthaltsberechtigungen. Gleichzeitig ist der Hype um die Ranglisten immer umstrittener, erste Universitäten verweigern bereits die Teilnahme. Die EU wird mit "U-Multirank" Ende Jänner indes erstmals ein eigenes Uni-Ranking präsentieren, das durch ein breiteres Spektrum an Leistungsindikatoren ein besseres und realistischeres Bild von den Hochschulen geben soll. Mehr...
10 janvier 2013

Comment le classement de Shanghaï a zappé le prix Nobel de l’université de Strasbourg

LeMonde.frPar Isabelle Rey-Lefebvre. Surprise, à la mi-août 2012, lors de la publication du classement de Shanghaï: parmi les 100 premières universités mondiales, l’université de Strasbourg n'y figure pas, reléguée au-delà de la centième place. La fusion, en 2009, des trois établissements strasbourgeois et, surtout, l’attribution du prix Nobel de médecine en 2011 au biologiste Jules Hoffmann, qui a réalisé toute sa carrière à Strasbourg, aurait pourtant dû faire grimper l’université alsacienne. Que s'est-il passé?
D’origine luxembourgeoise, Jules Hoffmann a opté pour la nationalité française en 1970 et travaillé sur le système immunitaire inné des mouches drosophiles. Bien qu'à la retraite, il se rend tous les jours dans son labo sur le campus de Strasbourg. Suite de l'article...

LeMonde.fr By Isabelle Rey-Lefebvre. Surprise in mid-August 2012, when the publication of the Shanghai ranking: among the top 100 world universities, the University of Strasbourg is not there, relegated beyond the hundredth site. More...

5 janvier 2013

University rankings a flawed tool

http://mg.co.za/images/mg_original.jpgThe manipulative game of comparison and quantification turns institutions into players, writes Sean Muller. How should we assess the quality and development of higher education ­institutions in South Africa? What is it that these institutions do that is socially valuable enough to justify receiving large sums of public money?
Is it the economic contribution of graduates, the societal importance of the research, other forms of contribution to society – providing a home for "public intellectuals" – or some particular combination of these?
With such considerations in mind, it is interesting to interrogate the increasing popularity of international university rankings as a means of either assessing university progress ("university x has done fantastically well in the past few years, climbing 20 places in the rankings") or setting a milestone for achievement ("our university mission is to be a top 50-ranked institution").
Although seductive in their ability to summarise institutional achievement in a single number, the many flaws of this approach suggest that it should, at best, be consigned a peripheral role in our determinations of institutional success.
To illustrate some of the problems, consider the Times Higher Education rankings, perhaps the most prominent of the growing number of published rankings. Read more...

Newsletter
49 abonnés
Visiteurs
Depuis la création 2 783 582
Formation Continue du Supérieur
Archives