This year’s Academic Reputation Survey offers the best geographical and disciplinary spread yet.
Source : Times Higher Education
The Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings are created using the world’s largest invitation-only academic opinion survey – a unique piece of research. Voir l'article...
By . Academicians say Russian universities may need a few decades to get into the top 100 in institutional rankings. When it comes to rankings by subject, Russian universities are in a stronger position. More...
Blog Educpros de . Dans ce making-of dédié aux palmarès conçus et publiés par l’Etudiant, vous trouverez des commentaires des réalisateurs, quelques secrets de tournage ou encore des scènes coupées au montage. Cet espace va nous permettre de vous plonger au coeur de nos matrices, faites de tableaux excel et autres formulaires google. Suite de l'article...
Sur le blog "Histoires d'universités" de Pierre Dubois. L’Université de Strasbourg, 88ème des 100 universités mondiales les plus innovantes (communiqué de l’UNISTRA, 26 octobre 2015).
Le 15 septembre 2015, Reuters News a publié la première édition d’un classement des cent universités mondiales les plus innovantes. Suite...
By . Innovation is one of the themes that many of those seeking broader global rankings of universities would like to be able to include.
The most comprehensive attempt to capture this slightly elusive quality was published last week by Thomson Reuters. The company used ten metrics to measure universities’ success in innovation, and produced a global top 100. More...
By . Despite the improved methodology described elsewhere in this issue of Higher Education World, the 2015/16 QS World University Ranking agree with last year’s on one thing: the Massachusetts Institute of Technology is the world’s top university. It has near-perfect scores on five of our six measures, and comes 62nd in the world on the other, its percentage of international students. More...
By . The twelfth edition of the QS World University Rankings is now online.
We pride ourselves on keeping the Rankings methodology as stable as possible, so that the results provide a genuine year-on-year comparison of the world’s top universities. But this year we have made a few improvements, one of them especially important, to our methodology. More...
By . The rankings season has started in earnest with the publication of the QS World University Rankings, and in this edition of the Higher Education World we examine the results and the impact of our biggest methodological change for a decade. More...
By . The QS World University Rankings by Faculty provide a more accurate comparison with last year’s results than our overall QS World University Rankings does. They are not affected by the methodological change that has caused extra volatility in the main rankings – this being the change in how citations are measured. Instead, the high level of stability in the Faculty Rankings illuminates the impact of the switch to normalising citations by faculty area. Few of the leading universities in any of the five faculty areas have moved by more than five places. More...
By . The methodology used to create the World University Rankings uses six robust measures which encapsulate the principal activities of global higher education. These measures are unchanged for the new 2015/16 Rankings. But as we explain here, the use we make of the data we collect has been improved markedly this year. More...
/https%3A%2F%2Fprofilepics.canalblog.com%2Fprofilepics%2F1%2F0%2F1076071.jpg)
