Canalblog
Suivre ce blog Administration + Créer mon blog
Formation Continue du Supérieur
17 août 2012

How does the Bologna Process work?

http://www.ehea.info/Themes/bologna/images/bologna_logo.jpgThe Bologna Process, launched with the Bologna Declaration, of 1999, is one of the main voluntary processes at European level, as it is nowadays implemented in 47 states, which define the European Higher Education Area (EHEA).
Members of the Bologna Process
are the 47 countries, together with the European Commission, and the consultative members, namely the Council of Europe, UNESCO-CEPES, EUA, ESU, EURASHE, ENQA, Education International and BUSINESSEUROPE.
Every two years there are Ministerial Conferences organised in order to assess the progress made within the EHEA and to decide on the new steps to be taken (more information can be found in the table below).
Ministerial Conferences

 Bologna, 18-19 June 1999 Bologna Declaration       
 Prague, 18-19 May 2001 Prague Communiqué; Conference website
 Berlin, 18-19 September 2003 Berlin Communiqué; Conference website
 Bergen, 19-20 May 2005 Bergen Communiqué; Conference website
 London, 17-18 May 2007 London Communiqué; Conference website
 Leuven/Louvain-la-Neuve, 28-29 April 2009 Leuven/Louvain-la-Neuve Communiqué; Conference website
 Budapest/Vienna, 10-12 March 2010 Budapest-Vienna Declaration; Conference website
 Bucharest, 26-27 April 2012 Bucharest Communiqué; Conference website
In order to ensure the implementation of the steps upon which the Ministers have decided, the EHEA makes use of several support structures.
The main follow-up structure is the Bologna Follow-up Group (BFUG). The BFUG oversees the Bologna Process between the ministerial meetings and meets at least once every six months, usually for one-and-a-half days. The BFUG has the possibility to set up working groups to deal with specific topics in more details and, also, receives input from Bologna Seminars. The BFUG is composed of the representatives of all members of the Bologna Process and the European Commission, with the Council of Europe, the EUA, EURASHE, ESU, UNESCO-CEPES, Education International, ENQA and BUSINESSEUROPE, as consultative members. The BFUG is being co-chaired by the country holding the EU Presidency and a non-EU country, which rotate every six months. The vice-chair is the country organising the next Ministerial Conference.
The work between two meetings of the Bologna Follow-up Group is overseen by a Board.
The composition of the Board changed in 2010, together with the adoption of the document “Briefing note for decision by the Ministers” (BFUG (ES) 20_7c).
The current members of the Board are:
• the EHEA Chairs double Trioka (the outgoing, present and incoming Chairs of the EHEA);
• the EHEA Vice-Chairs;
• the European Commission;
• four consultative members (Council of Europe, EUA, ESU, EURASHE).
The proceedings of the Board meetings are recorded by the Bologna Secretariat, who is permanently invited to Board meetings.
The overall follow-up work is supported by a Secretariat, provided by the country hosting the next Ministerial Conference. The mandate of the Bologna Secretariat coincides with the period between two ministerial conferences, and it is aimed to ensure the continuity for all the Bologna Process reforms, considering that the Bologna Process is chaired by the country holding the EU Presidencies, which rotates every six months.
The central task of the Bologna Secretariat is to support the work of the Follow-up Group at various levels: BFUG, Board, Working Groups, Networks and Seminars. The Secretariat prepares draft agendas, draft reports, notes and minutes and carries out the practical preparation for meetings as requested by the Chairs.
Another task of the Secretariat that has become increasingly important is to provide up-to-date and reliable information about the Bologna Process (for both a European and a non-European audience) and to maintain an electronic archive. To fulfill those functions, the Secretariat makes use of the EHEA permanent website as a central tool.
It is noticeable that the main advantage of the Bologna Process and the present support structures is that they enable the key stakeholders to work together as partners, and having a relatively informal character, thus increasing the sense of engagement and ownership among all participants.
To implement the Bologna reforms and to make progress in all priority areas, strong efforts will be required especially at national and institutional level. To support these efforts with joint action at European level, the Ministers entrusted the Bologna Follow-up Group to prepare a work plan for the period leading up to the next Ministerial Conference.
As part of the 2009-2012 work plan, the Bologna Follow-up Group set up seven working groups on the following topics:
- Social Dimension
- Qualifications Frameworks
- International Openness
- Mobility
- Recognition
- Reporting on the implementation of the Bologna Process
- Transparency mechanisms
To further disseminate the Bologna reforms, countries and organisations participating in the Bologna Process also organise various seminars and conferences that are announced via the calendar of events.
Disclaimer:
This text is part of the “Bologna beyond 2010 – Report on the development of the European Higher Education Area, Backgroung Paper for the Bologna Follow-up Group prepared by the Benelux Bologna Secretariat -, Leuven/Louvain-la-Neuve Ministerial Conference, 28-29 April 2009”.
A short overview of the EHEA functioning (according to the 2009-2012 work-plan) is presented in the table below:

14 août 2012

"Es ist zu früh, über die Bologna-Reform zu urteilen"

http://www.epapercatalog.com/images/zeit-online-epaper.jpgAnnette Schavan lobt die Hochschulreform als "europäische Erfolgsgeschichte". Mit dieser Äußerung macht sich die Ministerin angreifbar, kommentiert Jan-Martin Wiarda.
In diesen Tagen jährt sich die Einführung der Bachelor- und Masterabschlüsse zum zehnten Mal. Anlässlich des Jubiläums zog Bildungsministerin Annette Schavan in einem Interview Bilanz – und nannte den Bologna-Prozess "eine europäische Erfolgsgeschichte". Die Reform habe die Mobilität der Studierenden befördert und führe langfristig dazu, dass die Studienabbruchquote sinke. Doch stimmt das auch? Oder versucht die Ministerin, von Reform-Problemen abzulenken? Jan-Martin Wiarda, Redakteur im Chancen-Ressort der ZEIT, kommentiert Schavans Äußerungen per Video.
Annette Schavan lobt die Bologna-Reform als "europäische Erfolgsgeschichte". Doch stimmt das? Ein Video-Kommentar von Jan-Martin Wiarda [Video kommentieren].
Ist die Bologna-Reform zehn Jahre nach ihrem Start in Deutschland eine "europäische Erfolgsgeschichte", wie Bildungsministerin Anette Schavan sie jüngst bezeichnete? Jan-Martin Wiarda, Redakteur ZEIT-Chancen, über die Bildungsreform.
12 août 2012

Germany - Bologna reforms now implemented and widely accepted

http://enews.ksu.edu.sa/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/UWN.jpgByMichael Gardner. Ten years after the formal introduction of bachelor and masters degrees at German higher education institutions in the wake of the Bologna reforms, most courses have been adapted to the new degree system. Statistics suggest that the new degrees have found acceptance among students and industry.
“Developments over the last few years have shown that opting for a Europe-wide higher education reform was the right decision,” said Higher Education Minister Annette Schavan.
“Never before has student mobility been as high as it is today, and never before has studying taken so little time. Introducing the bachelor degree as an early degree qualifying for a profession offers graduates many options to plan a career.”
Schavan called the Bologna reforms a “European success story”.

1 août 2012

Bologna for Pedestrians

http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/highereducation/System/TB_en.jpgBologna for Pedestrians
What is the Bologna Process
?

The Bologna Process is a European reform process aiming at establishing a European Higher Education Area by 2010. It is an unusual process in that it is loosely structured and driven by the 46 countries participating in it in cooperation with a number of international organisations, including the Council of Europe.
This probably did not really answer the question. It comes down to the following:
By 2010 higher education systems in European countries should be organised in such a way that:
    * it is easy to move from one country to the other (within the European Higher Education Area) – for the purpose of further study or employment;
    * the attractiveness of European higher education is increased so many people from non-European countries also come to study and/or work in Europe;
    * the European Higher Education Area provides Europe with a broad, high quality and advanced knowledge base, and ensures the further development of Europe as a stable, peaceful and tolerant community.
This goal is rather ambitious and it is not connected only to the Bologna Process. However, within the Process, the necessary tools for achieving these goals are being developed and implemented.
Before we move further along, two things should be made clear:
The Bologna Process is not based on an intergovernmental treaty.
There are several documents that have been adopted by the ministers responsible for higher education of the countries participating in the Process, but these are not legally binding documents (as international treaties usually are). Therefore, it is the free will of every country and its higher education community to endorse or reject the principles of the Bologna Process, although the effect of “international peer pressure” should not be underestimated.
It is not foreseen that by 2010 all European countries should have the same higher education system.
On the contrary, one of the very valued features of Europe is its balance between diversity and unity. Rather, the Bologna Process tries to establish bridges that make it easier for individuals to move from one education system or country to another. Therefore, even if e.g. degree systems may become more similar, the specific nature of every higher education system should be preserved. If not, what would be the point to go somewhere else to study if what one studies is going to be the same as back home? The developments within the Bologna Process should serve to facilitate “translation” of one system to the other and therefore contribute to the increase of mobility of students and academics and to the increase of employability throughout Europe. .
How is the Process organised
?

There are several levels of implementation – international, national and institutional.
When it comes to the international level – there are several modes of cooperation and several structures developing the Bologna Process. There is the so-called Bologna follow-up group (BFUG) that consists of all signatory countries and the European Commission as well as the Council of Europe, EUA, ESU (ex-ESIB), EURASHE, UNESCO-CEPES, ENQA, Educational International Pan-European Structure and UNICE as consultative members.
In addition to this, numerous seminars are being organised throughout Europe, which carry the unofficial label of “Bologna seminars”. These are discussing various issues of the Bologna Process, obstacles to implementation and possibilities for co-operation. You will find an updated calendar on current events on the web site of the Benelux Bologna Secretariat. The results of previous Bologna seminars and activities are available on the UK Bologna Secretariat, the Bologna-Bergen web site (2003 – 2005) and the Berlin Ministerial Conference web site (2001 – 2003).
Every two years a Ministerial Conference is organised where Ministers responsible for higher education of all participating countries gather to evaluate the progress and to set guidelines and priorities for the upcoming period. The last conference took place in Leuven/Louvain-la-Neuve 2009. Previous conferences were held in London in May (2007), Bergen (2005), Berlin (2003), Prague (2001) and Bologna (1999) – see next section for more information.
The national level usually involves the government and ministries responsible for higher education, rectors’ conferences or other university associations, student unions but also in some cases quality assurance agencies, employers etc. Many European countries have already changed their legislation in line with the goals of the Bologna Process and others are preparing to do so. Depending on the country and the development of its higher education system so far, some are introducing ECTS, discussing their degree structures and qualifications, financing and management of higher education, mobility programmes etc.
The institutional level involves higher education institutions, their faculties or departments, student and staff representatives and many other actors. The priorities vary from country to country and from institution to institution. However, it is important to stress that without adequate implementation at the institutional level, little can be achieved in reaching the Bologna objectives.
How did it all begin
?

The Process officially started in 1999, with the signing of the Bologna Declaration. Twenty-nine countries have signed the declaration on 19 June 1999 in Bologna (hence the name of the whole Process). The Declaration states the following objectives:
    * adoption of a system of easily readable and comparable degrees;
    * adoption of a system essentially based on two main cycles, undergraduate and graduate;
    * establishment of a system of credits – such as in the ECTS;
    * promotion of mobility by overcoming obstacles to the free movement of students, teachers, researchers and administrative staff;
    * promotion of European co-operation in quality assurance;
    * promotion of the necessary European dimensions in higher education.
These six objectives are the essence of the Bologna process and have since been developed further, see below.
However, prior to the signing of the Bologna Declaration, another document was adopted by four countries: France, Germany, Italy and the United Kingdom – the Sorbonne Declaration. This declaration provided the necessary push towards the Bologna Declaration and indicated already in 1998 the main goals of the European Higher Education Area.
1999
: What has happened since 1999?

After the signing of the Bologna Declaration, a follow-up structure has been organised. The aforementioned Bologna Follow-Up Group was formed. It decided that the Ministerial meetings should take place every two years and the first was held in Prague in 2001. In the meantime, a general rapporteur for the Follow-Up Group was selected. This was Mr. Pedro Lourtie, who later became Deputy Minister of Education in Portugal. His task was to monitor implementation of the objectives of Bologna declaration and report on this to the Ministers of Education in Prague (for the report click here). Furthermore, different countries have organised the so-called “Bologna seminars” which covered various important topics. European University Association (which was formed in March 2001 from two European university networks) developed the so-called Trends II report – report on the implementation of the Bologna declaration at the institutional level and adopted the Message from the Salamanca Convention 2001. ESIB adopted the Student Gőteborg Declaration as a special student message for the Prague Ministerial Summit.
Prague 2001
.
In May 2001, in Prague, new countries joined the Bologna process: Croatia, Cyprus, Liechtenstein and Turkey. The ministers adopted the so-called Prague Communiqué, which sets guidelines for the next two years, until the Ministerial Conference on the Bologna Process in Berlin in 2003.
It is very important to stress that the Prague Summit introduced several new elements in the Process:
    * students were recognised as full and equal partners in the decision making process and ESIB became a consultative member of the Bologna follow-up group (together with the Council of Europe, European University Association and EURASHE);
    * the social dimension of the Bologna Process was stressed;
    * the idea that higher education is a public good and a public responsibility was highlighted.
In between 2001 and 2003, an even greater number of “Bologna seminars” were organised. Mr. Pavel Zgaga (former Minister of Education of Slovenia, one of those who actually signed the Bologna Declaration) was selected as the General Rapporteur (his report to the Berlin Ministerial Conference can be found here); the EUA developed its Trends III report and also started the Quality Culture Project in higher education institutions and launched a joint masters programme; ESIB completed several student surveys on the implementation of the Bologna Declaration; the European Commission supported several European projects (the Tuning project, the TEEP project) connected to quality assurance etc.
Berlin 2003
.

At the Berlin Ministerial Conference in September 2003, 7 new countries were accepted into the process (Albania, Andorra, Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Holy See, Russia, Serbia and Montenegro and “the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia”). Thus the total number of countries involved increased to 40. It was also decided that all countries party to the European Cultural Convention are eligible to take part in the Bologna Process provided they apply for accession and submit a satisfactory plan for implementation of the Bologna goals in their higher education system. Apart from taking note of the developments from 2001 to 2003 and setting guidelines for further work, the Berlin Communiqué also concluded:
    * that research is an important part of higher education in Europe and the European Higher Education Area and the European Research Area are in fact two pillars of the knowledge based society. Furthermore, it is necessary to go beyond the focus on two main cycles and the third cycle - doctoral studies - should be included in the Bologna process
    * that in time for their 2005 meeting, Ministers will take stock of progress in these key areas:
    * quality assurance;
    * two-cycle system;
    * recognition of degrees and periods of study;
    * the next Ministerial Conference will take place in Bergen in 2005.
The Bologna Follow-Up Group was asked to look into two issues especially:
    * quality assurance – for this the mandate was given to ENQA, EUA, ESIB and EURASHE;
    * qualifications framework.
Bergen 2005
.

At the Bergen Ministerial Conference in May 2005, 5 new countries were welcomed (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine) as new participating countries in the Bologna Process bringing the total number of participating countries up to 45. It was also decided to enlarge the circle of consultative members to the Education International (EI) Pan-European Structure, the European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ENQA), and the Union of Industrial and Employers’ Confederations of Europe (UNICE). The Bergen meeting confirmed the shift from future plans to practical implementation; in particular it was marked by
    * the adoption of an overarching framework of qualifications for the European Higher Education Area and with a commitment to elaborating national qualifications frameworks by 2010 – as well as to having launched work by 2007;
    * the adoption of guidelines and standards for quality assurance and the request that ENQA, the EUA, EURASHE and ESIB elaborate further proposals concerning the suggested register of quality assurance agencies;
    * the further stress on the importance of the social dimension of higher education, which includes – but is not limited to – academic mobility;
    * the necessity of improving interaction between the European Higher Education Area and other parts of the world (the “external dimension”);
    * the growing importance of addressing the development of the European Higher Education Area beyond 2010.
The Council of Europe addressed the Ministerial meeting’s opening session.
London 2007
.

In London in May 2007, Montenegro was welcomed to the Bologna Process following its declaration of independent in 2006, bringing the number of participating countries to 46. In London, Ministers also:
    * adopted a strategy for the Bologna Process in a Global Context;
    * took note of the second stock taking report;
    * considered reports on:
the social dimension of the Bologna Process and on mobility
portability of grants and loans
qualifications frameworks
a European Register of quality assurance agencies
    * As in Berlin, the Council of Europe addressed the opening session of the Ministerial conference.
Leuven/Louvain-la-Neuve 2009
.

On April 2009 the Ministerial conference was held in Leuven/Louvain-la-Neuve. Ministers took stock of developments since the previous conference in London (2007) and above all considered priorities and goals for the European Higher Education Area beyond 2010. In particular, Ministers:
    * took note of the Bologna 2009 Stocktaking Report
    * considered reports on:
    * Report on Qualifications Frameworks
    * Synthesis of National Qualifications Frameworks Reports;
    * L'Espace européen de l’enseignement supérieur (EHEA) dans un contexte global;
    * For the other documents clik here;
    * adopted the Leuven/Louvain-la-Neuve Communiqué.
As in London, the Council of Europe addressed the opening session of the Ministerial conference.
The Council submitted a report on its activities to further the Bologna Process since the previous ministerial conference.
On 29 April, the first Bologna Policy Forum gathered high ranking representatives of Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Egypt, Ethiopia, Israel, Japan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mexico, Morocco, New Zealand, Tunisia, USA, along with the International Association of Universities. In the statement adopted by the meeting, participants underlined the importance of developing cooperation on a range of policy issues.
Council of Europe
.
Who participates in the Process
?

Following the London Ministerial Conference, there are 46 countries that are participating in the Bologna process. These are:
    * from 1999: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom;
    * from 2001: Croatia, Cyprus, Liechtenstein, Turkey;
    * from 2003: Albania, Andorra, Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Holy See, Russia, Serbia, “the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia”;
    * from 2005: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine;
    * from May 2007: Montenegro.
Apart from the countries (who are all members of the Bologna follow-up group - BFUG), several international organizations are also participating:
    * European Commission;
    * Council of Europe – consultative member;
    * European University Association – consultative member;
    * EURASHE – consultative member;
    * ESU - The European Students’ Union (former ESIB) – consultative member;
    * UNESCO-CEPES – consultative member;
    * ENQA – consultative member;
    * Education International Pan-European Structure – consultative member;
    * UNICE – consultative member
1 août 2012

The eight Bologna Process ministerial conference and the third Bologna Policy Forum

http://www.ehea.info/Themes/bologna/images/bologna_logo.jpgThe month of April brought new crucial developments for European (and to an extent global) higher education, with the eight Bologna Process ministerial conference and the third Bologna Policy Forum. Ministerial delegations from the 47 member states of the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) met in Bucharest, Romania, on 26 and 27 April to discuss the future of this space of higher education, as well as the immediate policy priorities for the next three years. On this occasion, the ministers of education of the 47 countries signed the Bucharest Communiqué, the sixth document of this sort in the history of the Bologna Process. In addition to the communiqué, the EHEA ministers also adopted the EHEA Mobility Strategy – Mobility for better learning, a document outlining their priorities in the field of international student and staff mobility.
The Romanian Ministry of Education, Research, Youth and Sports has the honour to host the eighth Bologna Process/ EHEA Ministerial Conference and third edition of the Bologna Policy Forum, which will be held in Bucharest, Romania, on 26-27 April 2012 at the Palace of the Parliament.
The 2012 Bucharest Ministerial Conference is expected to bring together 47 European Higher Education Area ministerial delegations, the European Commission, as well as the Bologna Process consultative members and Bologna Follow-Up Group partners. The meeting will be an opportunity to take stock of progress of the Bologna Process and set out the key policy issues for the future. The EHEA ministers will jointly adopt the Bucharest Ministerial Communiqué, committing to further the Bologna goals until 2020.
The 2012 Bologna Policy Forum organised in conjunction with the Ministerial Conference is aimed to intensify policy dialogue and cooperation with partners across the world. The theme of the third Bologna Policy forum is "Beyond the Bologna process: Creating and connecting national, regional and global higher education spaces”. The Policy forum has four sub-themes, which will be addressed during the parallel sessions, namely: “Global academic mobility: Incentives and barriers, balances and imbalances”; “Global and regional approaches to quality enhancement of Higher Education”; “Public responsibility for and of HE within national and regional context”; “The contribution of Higher Education reforms to enhancing graduate employability”. This year’s edition of the Bologna Policy Forum will be finalised with the adoption of the 2012 Bologna Policy Forum Statement.
Around 100 ministerial delegations from all regions and 30 international organisations will be expected to be involved in both events.
For further information regarding the Ministerial Meetings please access the official EHEA website at the following link: www.ehea.info.
Welcome to the EHEA official website!
The European Higher Education Area (EHEA) was launched along with the Bologna Process' decade anniversary, in March 2010, during the Budapest-Vienna Ministerial Conference.
As the main objective of the Bologna Process since its inception in 1999, the EHEA was meant to ensure more comparable, compatible and coherent systems of higher education in Europe. Between 1999 - 2010, all the efforts of the Bologna Process members were targeted to creating the European Higher Education Area, that became reality with the Budapest-Vienna Declaration of March, 2010. The next decade will be aimed at consolidating the EHEA and thus the current EHEA permanent website will play a key role in this process of intense internal and external communication.
THE BOLOGNA SECRETARIAT HANDOVER CEREMONY HOSTED BY ARMENIA

Armenia will officially assume the responsibility of the Bologna Process Follow-up Group Secretariat starting from July 1, 2012. Armenia will coordinate the Bologna Secretariat until June 30, 2015. Close to this date Armenia will host the Ministerial Conference of the Bologna Process member states in the capital city of Yerevan. read more.
Council of Europe - New Recommendation on the Public Responsibility for Academic Freedom and Institutional Autonomy

On June 20, the CoE Committee of Ministers adopted Recommendation CM/Rec(2012)7 on the Public Responsibility on Academic Freedom and Institutional Autonomy. While several international texts address issues of academic freedom and institutional autonomy, this recommendation is – to our knowledge – the first to do so explicitly with a view to the role of public authorities.  The provisions of the recommendation are also considered in an Explanatory memorandum. read more.

26 juillet 2012

The Bologna Process and Professional Qualifications

LogoIn 2007, Directive EC/2005/36 on the Recognition of Professional Qualifications came into force. It regulates the automatic recognition of the basic qualifications required for the practice of medicine, dentistry, general care nursing, midwifery, veterinary surgery, pharmacy and architecture in the EU’s internal market. In addition to these ‘sectoral’ professions, hundreds of others fall within the scope of the Directive’s General System.
The relevant training is in many instances provided by higher education institutions, yet until now no attempt has been made to align the substance of the Directive with the emerging European Higher Education Area created by the Bologna Process. Therefore, since 2007 EUA has monitored developments in the EU institutions as well as in regulatory, professional, academic and student bodies, in order to explore the policy strands which are common to the Directive and to the EHEA. (Links to various updates appear below.)
In 2011, the European Commission set in motion a wide consultation process in the framework of the Directive’s quinquennial review. EUA’s responses to the two rounds of consultation are also available below.
2012 marks the launch of the legislative process triggered by the Commission’s publication of its proposed amendments. These do indeed contain elements that show how the Directive and the EHEA might be brought into closer alignment in the medium term. They are of great relevance to the higher education sector in Europe, particularly in respect of curriculum development, employability, lifelong learning, mobility instruments, qualifications frameworks and quality assurance. (Links to EUA’s briefing note and position paper are to be found below.)
Recognition of Professional Qualifications”: Update no. 9, June 2012
.
Future updates will appear regularly on this website. Inquiries should be directed to Howard Davies at
howard.davies@eua.be.

6 juillet 2012

The Bologna Process and Professional Qualifications

LogoIn 2007, Directive EC/2005/36 on the Recognition of Professional Qualifications came into force. It regulates the automatic recognition of the basic qualifications required for the practice of medicine, dentistry, general care nursing, midwifery, veterinary surgery, pharmacy and architecture in the EU’s internal market. In addition to these ‘sectoral’ professions, hundreds of others fall within the scope of the Directive’s General System.
The relevant training is in many instances provided by higher education institutions, yet until now no attempt has been made to align the substance of the Directive with the emerging European Higher Education Area created by the Bologna Process. Therefore, since 2007 EUA has monitored developments in the EU institutions as well as in regulatory, professional, academic and student bodies, in order to explore the policy strands which are common to the Directive and to the EHEA. (Links to various updates appear below.)
In 2011, the European Commission set in motion a wide consultation process in the framework of the Directive’s quinquennial review. EUA’s responses to the two rounds of consultation are also available below.
2012 marks the launch of the legislative process triggered by the Commission’s publication of its proposed amendments. These do indeed contain elements that show how the Directive and the EHEA might be brought into closer alignment in the medium term. They are of great relevance to the higher education sector in Europe, particularly in respect of curriculum development, employability, lifelong learning, mobility instruments, qualifications frameworks and quality assurance. (Links to EUA’s briefing note and position paper are to be found below.)
Recognition of Professional Qualifications”: Update no. 9, June 2012
.
Future updates will appear regularly on this website. Inquiries should be directed to Howard Davies at
howard.davies@eua.be.

31 mai 2012

Baustelle Bachelor

Fragen und Antworten zum Bologna-Prozess von Johann Osel. Weniger Semester, problemlos studieren im Ausland - eigentlich sollte die Bologna-Reform das Studentenleben in Europa erleichtern. Doch nicht alle Erwartungen wurden in der Praxis erfüllt.
Bildungs- und Arbeitsmarktpolitik werden die Zukunft Europas entscheiden. Was treibt Spaniens protestierende Jugend an? Wie können Bildungssysteme voneinander lernen? Was wird aus
dem Bologna-Prozess? Die Süddeutsche Zeitung widmet diesen Fragen ein Dossier, das in Zusammenarbeit mit El País, The Guardian, Gazeta Wyborcza, La Stampa und Le Monde entstanden ist. Das Dossier finden Sie auf dieser Seite.
Eigentlich sollte die Bologna-Reform das Studentenleben erleichtern: Wegen der neuen Abschlüsse Bachelor und Master könnten Studenten problemlos zwischen den Universitäten Europas wechseln, versprachen die Reformer. Zudem würden sie schneller einen Abschluss in Händen halten. Doch diese Erwartungen wurden in der Praxis nicht immer erfüllt.
Was ist der Bologna-Prozess?

Die Reform verfolgt zwei Hauptziele: einen gemeinsamen europäischen Hochschulraum durch vergleichbare Abschlüsse sowie die Orientierung des Studiums an der Beschäftigungsfähigkeit der Absolventen und damit den früheren Berufseinstieg. Der Bologna-Prozess - 1999 von knapp 30 europäischen Bildungsministern in der italienischen Stadt initiiert und inzwischen von 47 Staaten getragen - sollte bis 2010 den einheitlichen Hochschulraum schaffen. In Deutschland ist die Reform offiziell umgesetzt: Derzeit enden 85 Prozent der gut 15 000 Studiengänge mit den neuen Abschlüssen. Systematisch wurden in den vergangenen Jahren die alten Abschlüsse Magister und Diplom durch den in der Regel sechs Semester dauernden Bachelor ersetzt. An diesen ersten Abschluss, der bereits berufsqualifizierend sein soll, kann ein Masterstudium (meist vier Semester) angehängt werden.
Wie verläuft ein Bachelor-Studium?

Die Bologna-Staaten haben das "European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System" (ECTS) eingeführt, um Leistungen effektiver zu messen und international vergleichbar zu machen. Wurde früher nur die Zeit eines Seminars (Semesterwochenstunden) erfasst, wird mit der neuen Punkte-Währung auch der Aufwand für die Vor- und Nachbereitung gemessen (Workload). Ein Student belegt Module und sammelt zum Beispiel in sechs Semestern so viele ECTS-Punkte wie für den Bachelor nötig. Die einzelnen Module werden benotet und fließen in die Abschlussnote ein. Inhaltlich ist der Bachelor eine bewusste Verknappung eines Fachs - ein Master soll der Spezialisierung dienen.
Seite 2 Wie finden Arbeitgeber den Bachelor eigentlich?
12 mai 2012

The Bologna Process: reinventing the never-ending saga?

http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-snc4/174887_161806250531786_2075947517_q.jpgJust over a week ago, the Bucharest communiqué was adopted, the seventh communique in the Bologna process that started in 1999. Now encompassing 47 countries it often tends to be glorified by the actors involved as a great success and hallmark of changes achieved, whereas the research evidence tends to be more modest in terms of the actual impacts and convergence.
The presentation of the latest stocktaking report at the ministerial conference indicated a number of fuzzy areas (e.g. lifelong learning) and a number of areas where progress had not been very huge. However, there are areas that seem to be highlighted as success stories by all involved in the process. Indeed, for a number of reasons (and these varying from country to country) Bologna has arguably been an initiator for a number of reform processes in Europe and beyond, and there has been some structural convergence in terms of the introduction of the three cycles.
While the initial deadline for building the European Higher Education Area was in 2010, this did not mark an end point in the process. As the Romanian minister of education formulated it: there really are no alternatives so one needs to reinvent the Bologna Process. So – what would that entail and did the ministerial conference indicate that this reinvention ris either taking place or likely to take place?
Well, its large
The first thing that strikes you is the sheer scope of the event. Not only has the Bologna process now include 47 countries in Europe and Central Asia, the Bologna Policy Forum additionally attracts participants from all over the world, and the latest conference attracted in total representatives from approximately 100 national representations and 30 stakeholder organisations as indicated by the organisers.
Space for discussion or an empty space?
Despite Bologna in practice being a statement of intent and not having any legal status and implementation requirement, it provides a space for discussion and shared experiences. This creation of a “space for discussion” was also evident in many of the statements made by various representatives during the sessions and panel debates. However, one could also question what this space really means? At the end of the day it is national governments and national interests that set the agenda and decide locally. Thus, one could argue that the actual relevance of this discussion space is to what extent it is useful for the actors in their local context (whether in terms of becoming more European or pushing through unpopular reforms as necessary).
Overall, it appears that there are somewhat different approaches that countries take for this event: some discuss/participate actively, some appear to be giving speeches for the audience at home, and some just do not put too much effort. A similar division seems to apply the stakeholder organisations, but one could argue that they are overall much more active. Perhaps unsurprisingly the students were amongst the most active during the event and largely responsible for public funding becoming the big discussion topic during the debate. Of the draft proposal of the communique that was discussed it was in particular the “public” aspect of funding and automatic recognition that received attention.
The F-word and automatic recognition
Called the “F-word” by one of the panel chairs, funding and in particular public funding was the big issue where perhaps a clearest division of perspectives and perhaps even tension around the final formulation was identifiable – amendments, modified amendments and alternative formulations were suggested, and the final version ended up being “we commit to securing the highest possible level of public funding for higher education and drawing on other appropriate sources“. This formulation looks quite harmless and is perhaps of the type one tends to overlook in a document, however – its initial version was a basis for heated debates.
One can understand the students’ cause on keeping this ideal, even if only for symbolic purposes. The students considered keeping the final formulation with “public funding” as part of the formulation as a victory, as they Tweeted later on the ESU Twitter page. But, as indicated by some of the other contributions in the debates, this wording in the communique is perhaps a minor detail where an intergovernmental statement of intent does not really have leverage at home where political priorities might set set a different agenda. At the end of the day, “highest possible level of public funding” can also mean very little funding in a tight fiscal situation.
The second issue, in essence a much more controversial suggestion of automatic recgnition was in practice actually being overshadowed by the public funding discussion. While there were some concerns voiced of whether this is realistic and what this would mean in practice, the discussion never really picked up on this topic. One can only speculate whose victory this was.
Bologna – revitalized?
So – much discussion about public funding, a communique with not too many provocative aspects, with some ambitions of automatic recognition. Does this provide the new revitalization to the process? When the stakeholders were asked to formulate the relevance of Bologna in the future, the answers were not so very clear. Of course, it is only natural that they see the relevance from the starting points of the groups they represent, but it was quite difficult to see the clear points aside ideational importance of student-centeredness, respect towards diversity, cohesion, public importance of higher education and so forth. The bigger not-so-measurable concepts.
Another thing that sort of lurked behind the discussions was that it is increasingly difficult to distinguish EU activities from the Bologna process. While called the “lisbonisation of Bologna” in research literature some years ago, this division has become even more difficult. In one of their statements, Commission themselves called Bologna aims not complementary, but as a part of their policy objectives.
So now what?  While one should not make too strong conclusions from little evidence, one should note that it is fewer and fewer ministers of education who participate, and the conferences seem to take place further and further away from the traditional core of Europe. As any integration process – the broader the scope and the more members you try to integrate, the more superficial the integration becomes.
Symbolic? For the time being it seems to have become the never-ending saga that seems to have less actual meat on the bones, and the increasing number of countries make it more difficult to create a stronger platform for debate. But can it function as a space for discussion? Of course – but that requires all members to be actively interested in discussing.
11 mai 2012

Bologna-Reform lässt Anteil der Studienabbrecher steigen

http://www.epapercatalog.com/images/zeit-online-epaper.jpgDie Hochschulreform sollte die Quote der Studienabbrüche senken. Eine Studie zeigt das Gegenteil. Doch die Ergebnisse reichen nicht, um den Bachelor zu verteufeln.
Ein immer höherer Anteil an Studenten bricht das Bachelor-Studium ab. Dieses Ergebnis legen nun Bildungsforscher vom Hochschul-Informations-System (HIS) in einer Studie vor. Sie haben den Absolventenjahrgang 2010 untersucht. Insgesamt beendeten 28 Prozent der Studienanfänger der Jahrgänge 2006/2007 ihr Bachelor-Studium ohne Abschluss. Die Quote erhöht sich damit im Vergleich zu den Studienanfängern 2004/2005 um drei Prozentpunkte. Dieser Wert ist vor allem durch die Entwicklung an den Universitäten gestiegen: Während an Fachhochschulen nur 19 Prozent der Bachelor-Studienanfänger ihr Studium abbrechen, sind es an den Universitäten 35 Prozent.
Die deutliche Differenz zwischen den beiden Hochschulformen erklären sich die Autoren der Studie durch "Übergangs- und Anpassungsprobleme" bei der Einführung des Bachelors. Da die meisten Universitäten erst Mitte des vergangenen Jahrzehnts auf den Bachelor umgestellt haben, sind die Schwierigkeiten dort derzeit größer als an den Fachhochschulen, die bereits Anfang des Jahrzehnts den neuen Hochschulabschluss einführten.
Andere Voraussetzungen für verbleibende Diplomstudiengänge

2006 lag die Abbrecherquote an Fachhochschulen – also kurz nach der Umstellung – noch deutlich höher als von der aktuellen Studie ermittelt. Damals beendeten 39 Prozent der Studenten ihren Bachelorstudiengang ohne Abschluss. Offenbar macht sich hier der Erfahrungsvorsprung bemerkbar. Eine ähnliche Entwicklung ist somit auch an den Universitäten denkbar. Wesentlich geringer ist der Anteil der Studienabbrecher in den verbleibenden Diplomstudiengängen: an Universitäten liegt sie bei 24 Prozent, an Fachhochschulen bei 21 Prozent. Allerdings können diese Werte weder mit den Quoten für das Bachelorstudium noch mit den Abbruchzahlen früherer Generationen verglichen werden, weil die Übergangssituation andere Voraussetzungen schafft.
Sowohl an Universitäten als auch an Fachhochschulen liegt die Abbrecherquote bei Ingenieuren und Naturwissenschaftlern mit 39 und 30 Prozent am höchsten. Also gerade bei den Studiengängen, die sich am stärksten gegen die Einführung des Bachelors gewehrt haben. In der Fächergruppe Rechts-/Wirtschaftswissenschaften/Sozialwesen beenden dagegen nur sechs Prozent der Studienanfänger ihr Studium ohne Abschluss.
<< < 10 20 30 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 > >>
Newsletter
49 abonnés
Visiteurs
Depuis la création 2 783 504
Formation Continue du Supérieur
Archives