By “highly reliable” and “at least moderately valid.” Others, however, disagree or call for more research. Read more...
. Hopefully, another semester has come to a close for you and you’re catching up on some much needed research/sleep. After I’ve doled out grades for my students, I usually get a nice big stack of evaluations of my teaching abilities, filled out by those very same students who squeaked by with a “C-“in my class. At my previous university, it was the ONLY way my teaching was evaluated; for better or worse, no senior faculty or peers ever evaluated my teaching content, style, or skills in the classroom. A whopping 40% of my annual evaluation came from what my students recorded on bubble-sheets and, occasionally, their written comments. As a social scientist, I have had some general questions about the validity and the reliability of the whole process. Do students really know a good teacher when they see one? Isn’t this a little bit like letting the inmates evaluate the prison warden? I was glad to know that there has been a ton written on the topic, some of which has been summarized as implying that student evaluations of instructors are